-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evals #37
Evals #37
Changes from 1 commit
5177c29
e61e401
148a73f
ae6d163
e075c71
a077ad8
122efad
43e5e50
a518e5e
8dfe444
2bad0fe
399d80a
139770e
633ebfe
75a2f87
a4351af
022b9ce
98d3777
1d2309c
2cb4a14
58c01ac
311fc4a
4a9df8a
171e427
64263de
766e23f
75779f8
fa8934f
a8922db
2f0cb7a
cab2349
dd39b3b
cfe8c4d
fe11d1b
7ec1087
5d27598
a5d9302
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"issueResponses": [ | ||
{ | ||
"scenario": "UI Improvements Issue", | ||
"scenario": "manifest.name mismatch ", | ||
"issue": { | ||
"body": "Depends on #13\n\nWhat should be done:\n\n1. The \"select configuration\" step should be removed. Always use the \"production\" config.\n2. Show plugin readme on installing a new plugin (original comment)\n3. Show indicator if plugin is already installed (original comment)\n4. Load current config values in the editor (if config is present)\n5. Add \"Reset to defaults\" button which resets plugin options to default values (original comment)\n6. Add github redirect to the same page (example)", | ||
"number": 19, | ||
"html_url": "https://github.com/ubiquity-os/ubiquity-os-plugin-installer/issues/19/", | ||
"question": "@ubosshivaditya could you please provide a summary of the UI improvements needed based on the issue discussion and linked issues?" | ||
"body": "Manifests need to be updated so the name matches the intended name, which is the name of the repo it lives in.\n\nAny mismatch in manifest.name and the plugin repo, and we will not be able to install those plugins. The config will look like this:\n\nThis is because the worker URL contains the repo name, and we use that to match against manifest.name.", | ||
"number": 27, | ||
"html_url": "https://github.com/ubiquity-os/ubiquity-os-plugin-installer/issues/27/", | ||
"question": "@ubosshivaditya could you please provide a summary of the issue ?" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Will it be a problem to leave in Also this seems like a random example can you explain the context of this file further? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We can modify the app name to whatever is stored in the secrets; it doesn't matter, as the This file primarily contains solid baseline examples, including "gold star" responses to questions. We run the model with the same context and should expect similar performance. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have the production and beta instance of the app so I'm not sure about dealing with secrets to save the names. Think through how this will be configured and let me know what you think makes sense
I guess it's "gold standard" I just messed up the terminology when I called it "gold star". There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be better if we could just hard code names, and keep in consistent in the
No, you were correct—it's called a "gold star response"1. "Gold standard" is a different approach, but not the one we're discussing here. FootnotesThere was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hard coding seems questionable for developers but generally yes I agree that it's easier to deal with vs secrets. @gentlementlegen please decide There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this is no longer relevant, as we are using the LLM command router. |
||
}, | ||
"expectedResponse": "Based on the issue discussion and linked issues, here's a summary of the UI improvements needed:\n\n1. Configuration Simplification:\n- Remove the \"select configuration\" step\n- Always use \"production\" config as this is for partners\n- Development configs can be created manually when needed\n\n2. Plugin Information Display:\n- Show plugin readme when installing new plugins\n- Add indicator to show if a plugin is already installed\n- Load and display current config values in the editor when available\n\n3. Configuration Management:\n- Add \"Reset to defaults\" button for plugin options\n- Ensure proper handling of config values\n\n4. GitHub Integration:\n- Add GitHub redirect functionality to the same page\n- Reference implementation available in work.ubq.fi repository\n\nThis implementation depends on the config installer feature (#13) being completed first. The changes focus on improving user experience for partners while maintaining development flexibility through manual configuration options.", | ||
"expectedResponse": "The manifest.name should match the name of the repo it lives in. This is because the worker URL contains the repo name, and we use that to match against manifest.name.", | ||
"sender": { | ||
"login": "sshivaditya2019", | ||
"type": "User" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume
ubiquity-agent
is for testing purposes only.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I'll revert the changes, I am trying to make some examples for OA.