Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: designated verifier explanation #109

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sinui0
Copy link
Member

@sinui0 sinui0 commented Nov 29, 2024

No description provided.

src/faq.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@themighty1 themighty1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

One may wonder why the `Prover` can not simply generate a proof of the TLS connection locally without the help of another party.

This is not possible because of the way TLS is designed. Specifically, TLS utilizes symmetric-key cryptography with message authentication codes (MACs). As a consequence the TLS client, i.e. the `Prover`,
knows the secret key the `Server` uses to authenticate data and can trivially generate fake transcripts locally. Introducing another party into the connection mitigates this problem.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think some explanation is in order, otherwise seems like a cliff-hanger. I hope mine is generic enough.

Suggested change
knows the secret key the `Server` uses to authenticate data and can trivially generate fake transcripts locally. Introducing another party into the connection mitigates this problem.
knows the secret key the `Server` uses to authenticate data and can trivially generate fake transcripts locally. Introducing another party into the connection mitigates this problem by removing unilateral access to the secret key from the `Prover`.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants