Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New dataman #577

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

New dataman #577

merged 32 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

pussuw
Copy link

@pussuw pussuw commented Dec 7, 2023

Backport new dataman implementation, which is compatible with kernel mode as-is

@pussuw pussuw requested a review from jlaitine December 7, 2023 13:00
@jlaitine
Copy link

jlaitine commented Dec 7, 2023

LGTM, lets first test the PR output separately before merging though

sfuhrer and others added 27 commits December 11, 2023 12:09
clear dataman file and init initial value on creation
A version update is needed since the dataman is showing errors if data doesn't exist or if it is wrongly stored. This will force default data to be initialized.
tests dataman will trigger errors and run_nsh_cmd.py
 is not written to detect only when a test fails. This is properly tested with run_tests.py
…anges

This avoids the need to regularly access dataman for checking.
Avoids unnecessary dataman accesses
@pussuw pussuw merged commit 4072914 into main Dec 12, 2023
20 checks passed
@pussuw pussuw deleted the new_dataman branch December 12, 2023 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants