Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in calcJacobianTransformErrorDiff #988

Conversation

Levi-Armstrong
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f78e2c9) 90.91% compared to head (3110b4d) 90.91%.

❗ Current head 3110b4d differs from pull request most recent head 316f010. Consider uploading reports for the commit 316f010 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #988      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.91%   90.91%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         280      280              
  Lines       15878    15877       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        14436    14434       -2     
- Misses       1442     1443       +1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

tesseract_common/test/tesseract_common_unit.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tesseract_common/src/utils.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong force-pushed the fix/NumericalJacobianAngleAxisSingularity branch from 3110b4d to 316f010 Compare February 14, 2024 14:25
@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong merged commit 26f3e47 into tesseract-robotics:master Feb 14, 2024
11 checks passed
@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong deleted the fix/NumericalJacobianAngleAxisSingularity branch February 14, 2024 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants