Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[TEP-0145] CEL in WhenExpression
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
This commit adds the proposal of adding CEL in WhenExpression

Signed-off-by: Yongxuan Zhang [email protected]
  • Loading branch information
Yongxuanzhang committed Oct 1, 2023
1 parent 474a939 commit 09a2723
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 338 additions and 0 deletions.
337 changes: 337 additions & 0 deletions teps/0145-cel-in-whenexpression.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
---
status: implementable
title: CEL in WhenExpression
creation-date: '2023-09-21'
last-updated: '2023-10-01'
authors:
- '@jerop'
- '@chitrangpatel'
- '@Yongxuanzhang'
collaborators: []
---

# TEP-0145: CEL in WhenExpression

<!-- toc -->
- [Summary](#summary)
- [Motivation](#motivation)
- [Use Cases](#use-cases)
- [Goals](#goals)
- [Non Goals](#non-goals)
- [Related Work](#related-work)
- [Proposal](#proposal)
- [Syntax](#syntax)
- [Validation](#validation)
- [Example](#example)
- [Design Evaluation](#design-evaluation)
- [Simplicity](#simplicity)
- [Flexibility](#flexibility)
- [Conformance](#conformance)
- [User Experience](#user-experience)
- [Drawbacks](#drawbacks)
- [Alternatives](#alternatives)
- [Implementation Plan](#implementation-plan)
- [Upgrade and Migration Strategy](#upgrade-and-migration-strategy)
- [Implementation Pull Requests](#implementation-pull-requests)
- [References](#references)
<!-- /toc -->

## Summary

This TEP proposes to add CEL (Common Expression Language) support in `when` expressions to enable more powerful conditional execution and improve the user experience by offering a more concise way of defining conditionals.


## Motivation

CEL is a non-Turing complete language designed for simplicity, speed, safety, and portability. Tekton has adopted CEL expressions in [Trigger] to match specific events to trigger PipelineRuns, and [CELCustomRun] is implemented to experiment with CEL in Tekton Pipelines without adding CEL directly to the Tekton API.

There are several feature requests in the community which can be met if CEL is supported in Tekton Pipeline:
- [#3591] calls for supporting ANY match behaviour in `WhenExpressions` to execute the task if any `params` is not empty.
- [#3149] suggests using CEL to split the string instead of adding an additional task to do the work.

Take a look at current [WhenExpressions]:

```yaml
when:
- input: "$(params.path)"
operator: in
values: ["README.md"]
```
Current `WhenExpression` requires users to define three fields: `input`, `operator` and `values`. but CEL expressions can achieve the same functionality with a single string. Additionally, the current operator only supports `in` and `notin`, which can be limiting for complex use cases. For example, users will need to figure out [hacky workarounds][#3591] to support any in their case.

For these reasons, `WhenExpressions` would be a good place to start introducing CEL in Tekton Pipelines. This would allow users to write more concise and powerful conditional expressions, and it could be extended to other fields in the future.

### Use Cases

- Cover all the functionalities of current `WhenExpression` and offer a simpler way of having the conditional execution
- Support ANY: e.g. Execute the task with if any params is not empty
- Support numeric operators such as GreaterThan/LessThan, e.g. Execute the task if test coverage is large than a certain number.

### Goals
- Support CEL in `WhenExpression`.

### Non-Goals
- Support CEL in Pipeline API fields other than `WhenExpression`.

### Related Work

Similar expression evaluations are supported in other CI/CD tools in the industry:
- [Argo][Argo]: `Workflows` support conditional execution using a when property to specify whether to run or skip a `Step` ([example][argo example]).
- [GitHub Actions][GitHub Actions]: supports evaluating expressions in `if` of a `step` to enable conditional execution.
- [Jenkins][Jenkins]: executes the stage when the specified Groovy expression evaluates to true.
- [Spinnaker][Spinnaker]: Uses string expressions, `Stages` only run when expressions evaluate to `True`.


## Proposal

This doc proposes to add a `string` type field `cel` under `WhenExpression`. Like [CelCustomRun][CELCustomRun], we propose to use [cel-go][cel-go] for the expression evaluation. This will allow users to craft any valid CEL expression as defined by the [cel-spec][cel-spec] language definition.


### Syntax

In this section we will show how CEL can support the [use cases](#use-cases).

#### Use CEL to replace current WhenExpression
```yaml
# current WhenWxpressions
when:
- input: "foo"
operator: "in"
values: ["foo", “bar”]
- input: "duh"
operator: "notin"
values: ["foo", “bar”]
# with cel
when:
- cel: "\”foo\” in [\"foo\", \“bar\”]”
- cel: "\”duh\” not in [\"foo\", \“bar\”]”
```

**Note:** The `WhenExpressions` contains a list of `WhenExpression`, if all `WhenExpressions` are true it will return true and allow execution. So we’re using AND to evaluate the list of `WhenExpressions`. And this will remain the same for this proposal. Each existing `WhenExpression` can be replaced with a CEL expression.

#### Use CEL to Support ANY operator

This is the workaround from [#3591][#3591],
```yaml
when:
- input: "$(params.param1)$(params.param2)"
operator: notin
values: [""]
```

With CEL we can use a more intuitive expression to support it.
```yaml
when:
- cel: "\"$(params.param1)\" != \"\" || \"$(params.param2)\" != \"\""
```

#### Use CEL to Support Numeric Comparisons

This is not possible with current `WhenExpression`. With CEL we can do:

```yaml
when:
- cel: "\"$(tasks.unit-test.results.test-coverage)\" >= 0.9"
```

[Note:][numeric note] currently there are no automatic arithmetic conversions for the numeric types (int, uint, and double), so the emitted results must be the same numeric type to make sure the evaluation works.


### Validation

The new fields will be gated by a new feature flag, `enable-cel-whenexpression`, which will defaults to `"false"` while the feature is in alpha.

The validation webhook will validate either the current when `input`+`operator`+`values` or `cel` is used, users cannot use both at the same time for one `WhenExpression`.


### Example

This is an E2E example:

```yaml
apiVersion: tekton.dev/v1
kind: PipelineRun
metadata:
generateName: guarded-pr-
spec:
pipelineSpec:
params:
- name: path
type: string
description: The path of the file to be created
- name: branches
type: array
description: The list of branch names
workspaces:
- name: source
description: |
This workspace is shared among all the pipeline tasks to read/write common resources
tasks:
- name: create-file
when:
- cel: "\"$(params.path)\" == \"README.md\""
workspaces:
- name: source
workspace: source
taskSpec:
workspaces:
- name: source
description: The workspace to create the readme file in
steps:
- name: write-new-stuff
image: ubuntu
script: 'touch $(workspaces.source.path)/README.md'
- name: check-file
params:
- name: path
value: "$(params.path)"
workspaces:
- name: source
workspace: source
runAfter:
- create-file
taskSpec:
params:
- name: path
workspaces:
- name: source
description: The workspace to check for the file
results:
- name: exists
description: indicates whether the file exists or is missing
steps:
- name: check-file
image: alpine
script: |
if test -f $(workspaces.source.path)/$(params.path); then
printf yes | tee $(results.exists.path)
else
printf no | tee $(results.exists.path)
fi
- name: echo-file-exists
when:
- cel: "\"$(tasks.check-file.results.exists)\" in [\"yes\"]"
taskSpec:
steps:
- name: echo
image: ubuntu
script: 'echo file exists'
finally:
- name: finally-task-should-be-executed
when:
- cel: "\"$(tasks.echo-file-exists.status)\" == \"Succeeded\""
- cel: "\"$(tasks.status)\" == \"Succeeded\""
- cel: "\"$(tasks.check-file.results.exists)\" == \"yes\""
- cel: "\"$(params.path)\" == \"README.md\""
taskSpec:
steps:
- name: echo
image: ubuntu
script: 'echo finally done'
params:
- name: path
value: README.md
- name: branches
value:
- main
- hotfix
workspaces:
- name: source
volumeClaimTemplate:
spec:
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
resources:
requests:
storage: 16Mi
```

## Design Evaluation

### Simplicity

The proposal helps to reduce the verbosity in Tekton by using 1 string of CEL expression instead of 3 (input+operator+values).

### Flexibility

CEL is a powerful expression language that can be used to perform a wide variety of tasks in CI/CD pipelines. This increases the flexibility of `WhenExpression` in Tekton to handle more complex conditions.

### Conformance

The proposal will introduce an additive change to the current API. It does not impact conformance in the inital release.

### User Experience

This proposal should help to improve the user experience by
- simplifying the syntax for `WhenExpression`
- support more complex conditional execution instead of hacky workaround

### Drawbacks

Users need to be familar with CEL expression syntax to use it properly, this may be a learning curve but they can choose to use current `WhenExpression` syntax for simple cases.


## Alternatives

### Support More Operators in current WhenExpression
Tekton can support more operators from [k8s apimachinery][k8s apimachinery] in `WhenExpression`'s `Operator`.

### Use languages other than CEL
CEL has been adopted in Tekton Triggers and CustomTask. We could add it first and consider other languages support as future work.

## Implementation Plan

### Update existing fields in v1 API

Add `CEL` to `WhenExpression`:
```go
type WhenExpression struct {
// Input is the string for guard checking which can be a static input or an output from a parent Task
Input string `json:"input"`

// Operator that represents an Input's relationship to the values
Operator selection.Operator `json:"operator"`

// Values is an array of strings, which is compared against the input, for guard checking
// It must be non-empty
// +listType=atomic
Values []string `json:"values"`

// CEL is a CEL expression to evaluate, if follows the cel-spec language definition
CEL string `json:"cel",omitempty`
}
```

### Upgrade and Migration Strategy

This feature will be introduced in alpha with a dedicated feature flag which is disabled by default.

When the feature is promoted to beta, the dedicated feature flag will be enabled by default.

When the feature is promoted to stable, the dedicated feature flag will be removed and the feature will be available by default.

### Implementation Pull Requests

TODO

## References
- [Tekon Trigger][Trigger]
- [CELCustomRun][CELCustomRun]
- [cel-go][cel-go]

[Trigger]: https://tekton.dev/docs/triggers/cel_expressions/
[CELCustomRun]: https://github.com/tektoncd/experimental/tree/master/cel
[#3591]: https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/3591
[#3149]: https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/3149
[WhenExpressions]: https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/blob/main/docs/pipelines.md#guard-task-execution-using-when-expressions
[Argo]:https://github.com/argoproj/argo/tree/master/examples#conditionals
[argo example]: https://github.com/argoproj/argo/blob/master/examples/conditionals.yaml
[GitHub Actions]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/expressions#example-expression-in-an-if-conditional
[Jenkins]: https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/syntax/#when
[Spinnaker]: https://www.spinnaker.io/guides/user/pipeline/expressions/#dynamically-skip-a-stage
[cel-go]:https://github.com/google/cel-go
[cel-spec]:https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/master/doc/langdef.md
[numeric note]: https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/master/doc/langdef.md#numeric-values
[k8s apimachinery]:https://pkg.go.dev/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/selection#Operator
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions teps/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -130,3 +130,4 @@ This is the complete list of Tekton TEPs:
|[TEP-0138](0138-decouple-api-and-feature-versioning.md) | Decouple api and feature versioning | proposed | 2023-07-27 |
|[TEP-0140](0140-producing-results-in-matrix.md) | Producing Results in Matrix | implementable | 2023-08-21 |
|[TEP-0141](0141-platform-context-variables.md) | Platform Context Variables | proposed | 2023-08-21 |
|[TEP-0145](0145-cel-in-whenexpression.md) | CEL in WhenExpression | implementable | 2023-10-01 |

0 comments on commit 09a2723

Please sign in to comment.