Implement syncing with parent item location. #275
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a feature that allows the synchronization of child item locations with their parent item when the parent's location is updated. This is achieved by adding a boolean field, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Security Recommendations
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (11)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
🔇 Additional comments (1)frontend/pages/item/[id]/index/edit.vue (1)
This issue was previously identified in an earlier review. The event handlers should not include parentheses to prevent immediate execution during render. Also applies to: 593-598, 607-607 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
tankerkiller125
force-pushed
the
parent-location-sync
branch
from
5e9d392 to
17e7e24
Compare
|
As a note, we're basically ignore the PR Testing CI, but I needed a PR to test it on to see what's broken so I can hopefully fix it. It has no effect on if we merge this or not. Although the Go Lint does have a valid thing that @coderabbitai missed. Notably:
|
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @tankerkiller125: Thank you for pointing out the variable naming issue. I apologize for missing this during the review. You're correct—Go naming conventions recommend using camelCase without underscores for variable names, as per Stylecheck ST1003. The variable Consistent adherence to coding standards improves code readability and maintainability, which helps prevent potential bugs and security vulnerabilities. ✏️ Learnings added
|
|
Thanks for updating to fix the underscores @slid1amo2n3e4 ! |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
@katosdev: Understood, and it's great to see that the underscores have been fixed. I will perform a full review of the pull request. ✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/lib/api/__test__/user/items.test.ts (1)
200-208: Use faker for consistent test data generation.Consider using faker for generating test data to maintain consistency with other tests in the file.
- name: "parent-item", + name: faker.commerce.productName(), - description: "test-description", + description: faker.lorem.sentence(),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/lib/api/test/user/items.test.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/pages/item/[id]/index/edit.vue (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/lib/api/__test__/user/items.test.ts (3)
241-250: Verify syncChildItemsLocations flag in the response.The test sets the sync flag but doesn't verify if it was properly set in the response data.
Add verification:
expect(updateResponse.status).toBe(200); +expect(updateData.syncChildItemsLocations).toBe(true);
251-261: Enhance test coverage with additional test cases.While the test verifies the basic functionality, consider adding:
- Verification that other properties remained unchanged
- Negative test case when syncChildItemsLocations is false
- Error cases (e.g., invalid location IDs)
Example additions:
// Verify other properties remained unchanged expect(child1FinalData.name).toBe(child1Item.name); expect(child1FinalData.description).toBe(child1Item.description); // Add negative test case test("child items don't sync location when flag is false", async () => { // Similar setup but with syncChildItemsLocations: false // Verify locations remain unchanged }); // Add error case test("handles invalid location IDs gracefully", async () => { // Setup with invalid location ID // Verify appropriate error response });
195-261: Add security-related test cases.The test should verify that proper authorization checks are in place to prevent unauthorized users from modifying item locations.
Add security test cases:
test("prevents unauthorized users from syncing locations", async () => { const unauthorizedApi = await createUnauthorizedUserClient(); // Attempt to update parent with sync flag const { response } = await unauthorizedApi.items.update(parent.id, { ...parent, syncChildItemsLocations: true }); expect(response.status).toBe(403); }); test("prevents syncing locations across different organizations", async () => { // Setup items in different organizations // Attempt to establish parent-child relationship // Verify it's prevented });frontend/pages/item/[id]/index/edit.vue (1)
478-478:⚠️ Potential issueAdd a semicolon at the end of the assignment statement.
There's a missing semicolon at the end of the assignment on line 478. Adding it ensures consistency and prevents potential syntax issues.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- item.value.location = data.location + item.value.location = data.location;Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
@tankerkiller125 @katosdev Anything I can do to help move this along? |
This PR needs to be able to pass all the tests before we can merge it. As it stands the overall code is good, but no longer passing tests and builds for some reason. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go (1)
70-78: Ensure validation forSyncChildItemsLocationsinItemUpdateConsider adding validation logic for the new
SyncChildItemsLocationsfield in theItemUpdatestruct to ensure it receives valid boolean values and to prevent potential issues during updates.backend/internal/data/ent/item_create.go (1)
620-622: Avoid redundant validation forSyncChildItemsLocationsSince
SyncChildItemsLocationshas a default value set in thedefaultsmethod, the validation in thecheckmethod may be unnecessary. This validation could cause errors if existing code does not explicitly set this field.Apply this diff to remove the redundant validation:
if _, ok := ic.mutation.AssetID(); !ok { return &ValidationError{Name: "asset_id", err: errors.New(`ent: missing required field "Item.asset_id"`)} } -if _, ok := ic.mutation.SyncChildItemsLocations(); !ok { - return &ValidationError{Name: "sync_child_items_locations", err: errors.New(`ent: missing required field "Item.sync_child_items_locations"`)} -}
🛑 Comments failed to post (3)
frontend/components/Form/Toggle.vue (1)
1-35:
⚠️ Potential issueSanitize
labelprop to prevent potential XSS vulnerabilitiesIf the
labelprop can contain user-generated content, ensure that it is properly sanitized before rendering to prevent cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.frontend/pages/item/[id]/index/edit.vue (2)
469-483: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null checks for
data.locationbefore assignmentIn the
maybeSyncWithParentLocationfunction, ensure thatdata.locationis defined before assigning it toitem.value.locationto prevent potential runtime errors ifdata.locationis undefined.Apply this diff to add the null check:
if (data.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.info("Selected parent syncs its children's locations to its own. The location has been updated."); + if (data.location) { item.value.location = data.location; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async function maybeSyncWithParentLocation() { if (parent.value && parent.value.id) { const { data, error } = await api.items.get(parent.value.id); if (error) { toast.error("Something went wrong trying to load parent data"); return; } if (data.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.info("Selected parent syncs its children's locations to its own. The location has been updated."); if (data.location) { item.value.location = data.location; } } } }
485-498: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null checks for
data.syncChildItemsLocationsIn the
informAboutDesyncingLocationFromParentfunction, ensure thatdata.syncChildItemsLocationsexists before checking its value to avoid potential undefined property access.Apply this diff to add the null check:
if (error) { toast.error("Something went wrong trying to load parent data"); return; } + if (data && data.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.info("Changing location will de-sync it from the parent's location"); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async function informAboutDesyncingLocationFromParent() { if (parent.value && parent.value.id) { const { data, error } = await api.items.get(parent.value.id); if (error) { toast.error("Something went wrong trying to load parent data"); return; } if (data && data.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.info("Changing location will de-sync it from the parent's location"); } } }
|
Looks like just the conflicts to me now, and then good to go? Thoughts please @tankerkiller125 ? |
|
I've resolved the conflicts with main as the source of truth. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
frontend/pages/item/[id]/index/edit.vue (1)
Line range hint
465-607: Security RecommendationsPlease consider implementing the following security measures:
- Add CSRF protection to all API endpoints
- Implement rate limiting for API calls
- Sanitize location data before rendering to prevent XSS
- Add input validation for all user-provided data
- Implement proper error logging for security events
- Consider adding API request timeouts
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these security measures?
🛑 Comments failed to post (3)
frontend/pages/item/[id]/index/edit.vue (3)
481-494: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add rate limiting to prevent API abuse
The
informAboutDesyncingLocationFromParentfunction makes API calls that should be rate-limited to prevent abuse.Consider implementing debouncing:
+import { debounce } from 'lodash-es'; + -async function informAboutDesyncingLocationFromParent() { +const informAboutDesyncingLocationFromParent = debounce(async () => { if (parent.value && parent.value.id) { const { data, error } = await api.items.get(parent.value.id); if (error) { toast.error("Something went wrong trying to load parent data"); return; } if (data.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.info("Changing location will de-sync it from the parent's location"); } } -} +}, 300);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { debounce } from 'lodash-es'; const informAboutDesyncingLocationFromParent = debounce(async () => { if (parent.value && parent.value.id) { const { data, error } = await api.items.get(parent.value.id); if (error) { toast.error("Something went wrong trying to load parent data"); return; } if (data.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.info("Changing location will de-sync it from the parent's location"); } } }, 300);
465-479:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation and error handling improvements
The
maybeSyncWithParentLocationfunction needs additional safeguards:
- Validate
parent.value.idbefore making the API call- Handle potential race conditions when updating locations
- Add error type checking for better error messages
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
async function maybeSyncWithParentLocation() { - if (parent.value && parent.value.id) { + if (!parent.value?.id) { + return; + } + try { const { data, error } = await api.items.get(parent.value.id); if (error) { toast.error("Something went wrong trying to load parent data"); return; } if (data.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.info("Selected parent syncs its children's locations to its own. The location has been updated."); item.value.location = data.location; } + } catch (e) { + console.error('Failed to sync with parent location:', e); + toast.error("Unexpected error occurred while syncing location"); } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async function maybeSyncWithParentLocation() { if (!parent.value?.id) { return; } try { const { data, error } = await api.items.get(parent.value.id); if (error) { toast.error("Something went wrong trying to load parent data"); return; } if (data.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.info("Selected parent syncs its children's locations to its own. The location has been updated."); item.value.location = data.location; } } catch (e) { console.error('Failed to sync with parent location:', e); toast.error("Unexpected error occurred while syncing location"); } }
496-522:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement proper error handling and data validation
The
syncChildItemsLocationsfunction needs improvements in error handling and data validation:Apply this diff to enhance security and reliability:
async function syncChildItemsLocations() { + // Validate required data if (!item.value.location?.id) { toast.error("Failed to save item: no location selected"); return; } + // Validate and sanitize data before creating payload const payload: ItemUpdate = { ...item.value, - locationId: item.value.location?.id, + locationId: item.value.location.id, // Already validated above labelIds: item.value.labels.map(l => l.id), parentId: parent.value ? parent.value.id : null, assetId: item.value.assetId, }; + try { const { error } = await api.items.update(itemId.value, payload); if (error) { toast.error("Failed to save item"); return; } if (!item.value.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.success("Child items' locations will no longer be synced with this item."); } else { toast.success("Child items' locations have been synced with this item"); } + } catch (e) { + console.error('Failed to sync child locations:', e); + toast.error("Unexpected error occurred while updating sync settings"); + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async function syncChildItemsLocations() { // Validate required data if (!item.value.location?.id) { toast.error("Failed to save item: no location selected"); return; } // Validate and sanitize data before creating payload const payload: ItemUpdate = { ...item.value, locationId: item.value.location.id, // Already validated above labelIds: item.value.labels.map(l => l.id), parentId: parent.value ? parent.value.id : null, assetId: item.value.assetId, }; try { const { error } = await api.items.update(itemId.value, payload); if (error) { toast.error("Failed to save item"); return; } if (!item.value.syncChildItemsLocations) { toast.success("Child items' locations will no longer be synced with this item."); } else { toast.success("Child items' locations have been synced with this item"); } } catch (e) { console.error('Failed to sync child locations:', e); toast.error("Unexpected error occurred while updating sync settings"); } }
|
Thanks @slid1amo2n3e4 ! |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Implements ability to sync parent item's location to its children.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #110
sht do I have to also include this?: close #110
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Tests
Documentation