Begin adding Purchase Method to item purchase details #124
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@katosdev has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes primarily involve introducing and integrating a new field, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Frontend
participant Backend
participant Database
User ->> Frontend: Input purchase method
Frontend ->> Backend: Submit item with purchase method
Backend ->> Database: Store purchase method in items table
Database ->> Backend: Acknowledge storage
Backend ->> Frontend: Confirm item registration
Frontend ->> User: Display confirmation
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
CC @brenletheninja - WIP but just to keep you in the loop :) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
backend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.go (1)
205-208: Potential misassignment ofPurchaseMethodinservice_items.go.It appears that in
backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go, thePurchaseFromfield is being assigned the value ofrow.PurchaseMethod. This might be an error. Please verify and correct this assignment if necessary.
- File:
backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go- Line:
PurchaseFrom: row.PurchaseMethodAnalysis chain
Integration of
PurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield appears to be correctly integrated into theReadItemsmethod. Ensure that this field is consistently used across the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `PurchaseMethod` field across the codebase. # Test: Search for the `PurchaseMethod` field usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'PurchaseMethod'Length of output: 747
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- backend/app/api/static/docs/swagger.json (1 hunks)
- backend/app/api/static/docs/swagger.yaml (1 hunks)
- backend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.go (1 hunks)
- backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go (1 hunks)
- backend/internal/data/ent/schema/item.go (1 hunks)
- backend/internal/data/migrations/migrations/20220929052825_init.sql (1 hunks)
- backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go (4 hunks)
- backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.go (2 hunks)
- docs/docs/api/openapi-2.0.json (1 hunks)
- docs/en/import-csv.md (1 hunks)
- frontend/lib/api/test/user/stats.test.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- backend/app/api/static/docs/swagger.json
- backend/app/api/static/docs/swagger.yaml
- docs/docs/api/openapi-2.0.json
Additional comments not posted (10)
backend/internal/data/ent/schema/item.go (1)
79-80: Addition ofpurchase_methodfield is appropriate.The
purchase_methodfield has been added as an optional string field, which aligns with the existing schema design.docs/en/import-csv.md (1)
66-66: Addition ofHB.purchase_methodcolumn is appropriate.The
HB.purchase_methodcolumn has been added to the CSV reference with a clear description, aligning with the documentation style.frontend/lib/api/__test__/user/stats.test.ts (2)
19-19: Addition ofHB.purchase_methodfield inImportObjinterface is appropriate.The
HB.purchase_methodfield has been added to theImportObjinterface, aligning with the existing structure.
66-66: Addition ofHB.purchase_methodfield inimportFileGeneratorfunction is appropriate.The
HB.purchase_methodfield has been added to theimportFileGeneratorfunction, generating a value using faker data, which aligns with the existing structure.backend/internal/data/migrations/migrations/20220929052825_init.sql (1)
20-20: Addition ofpurchase_methodcolumn initemstable is appropriate.The
purchase_methodcolumn has been added as a nullable text field, aligning with the existing table structure.backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go (1)
301-301: Integration ofPurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield appears to be correctly integrated into theCsvImportmethod. Ensure that this field is consistently used across the codebase.Verification successful
Integration of
PurchaseMethodfield is correct and consistent.The
PurchaseMethodfield is appropriately integrated and consistently used across the codebase. The field appears in service methods, tests, and data structures without any issues.
backend/internal/core/services/service_items.gobackend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.gobackend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.gobackend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `PurchaseMethod` field across the codebase. # Test: Search for the `PurchaseMethod` field usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'PurchaseMethod'Length of output: 747
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather context around the usage of the `PurchaseMethod` field in the identified files. # Extract 5 lines before and after the match for better context. rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.goLength of output: 3533
backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.go (1)
239-239: Integration ofPurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield appears to be correctly integrated into theTestItemsRepository_Updatemethod. Ensure that this field is consistently used across the codebase.Also applies to: 266-266
Verification successful
Integration of
PurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield appears to be correctly integrated into theTestItemsRepository_Updatemethod and other parts of the codebase. The field is consistently used across the data structures, service logic, and test cases.
backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.gobackend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.gobackend/internal/core/services/service_items.gobackend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `PurchaseMethod` field across the codebase. # Test: Search for the `PurchaseMethod` field usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'PurchaseMethod'Length of output: 747
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather context around the usages of the `PurchaseMethod` field in the identified files. # Fetch lines around the usage in backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go # Fetch lines around the usage in backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.go # Fetch lines around the usage in backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go # Fetch lines around the usage in backend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.goLength of output: 3533
backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go (3)
600-600: Integration ofPurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield appears to be correctly integrated into theUpdateByGroupmethod. Ensure that this field is consistently used across the codebase.Verification successful
Integration of
PurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield appears to be correctly integrated into theUpdateByGroupmethod. Ensure that this field is consistently used across the codebase.
backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go: LinePurchaseFrom: row.PurchaseMethod,backend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.go: LinePurchaseMethod: item.PurchaseMethod,backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.go: LinesPurchaseMethod: fk.Str(10),andassert.Equal(t, updateData.PurchaseMethod, got.PurchaseMethod)backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go: LinesPurchaseMethod stringjson:"purchaseMethod"andSetPurchaseMethod(data.PurchaseMethod).`Category:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `PurchaseMethod` field across the codebase. # Test: Search for the `PurchaseMethod` field usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'PurchaseMethod'Length of output: 747
151-151: Integration ofPurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield appears to be correctly integrated into theItemOutstruct. Ensure that this field is consistently used across the codebase.Verification successful
Integration of
PurchaseMethodfield is correct and consistent.The
PurchaseMethodfield is consistently used across the codebase in various contexts, including tests, data repository, services, and reporting. This indicates a thorough integration of the new field.
backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.gobackend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.gobackend/internal/core/services/service_items.gobackend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `PurchaseMethod` field across the codebase. # Test: Search for the `PurchaseMethod` field usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'PurchaseMethod'Length of output: 747
94-94: Integration ofPurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield appears to be correctly integrated into theItemUpdatestruct. Ensure that this field is consistently used across the codebase.Verification successful
Integration of
PurchaseMethodfield is correct.The addition of the
PurchaseMethodfield is consistently used across the codebase in various contexts such as testing, service layer operations, and reporting. The integration appears to be correct and does not introduce any issues.
repo_items_test.go: Used for testing thePurchaseMethodfield.repo_items.go: Properly defined and assigned within the struct.service_items.go: Utilized in service layer operations.io_sheet.go: Used in reporting.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `PurchaseMethod` field across the codebase. # Test: Search for the `PurchaseMethod` field usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'PurchaseMethod'Length of output: 747
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context of `PurchaseMethod` field usage in relevant files. # Check the context of `PurchaseMethod` in repo_items_test.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items_test.go # Check the context of `PurchaseMethod` in repo_items.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go # Check the context of `PurchaseMethod` in service_items.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/core/services/service_items.go # Check the context of `PurchaseMethod` in io_sheet.go rg --type go --context 5 'PurchaseMethod' backend/internal/core/services/reporting/io_sheet.goLength of output: 3533
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (1)
- backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- backend/internal/data/repo/repo_items.go
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds support for Purchase Method, as requested in #117. This is a first-version PR with an MVP implementation.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #117
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please take special care to review migrations, as I am more than likely going to be breaking implementations if the databases are not properly migrated to include the new tables.
Summary by CodeRabbit
purchaseMethodfield across various components for better tracking of item purchase methods.purchaseMethodfield.purchaseMethodfield.purchaseMethodfield in item repository updates.