Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First batch of NLU signals #501

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Oct 6, 2023
Merged

First batch of NLU signals #501

merged 14 commits into from
Oct 6, 2023

Conversation

bfilar
Copy link
Member

@bfilar bfilar commented Jun 8, 2023

No description provided.

@bfilar bfilar changed the title first batch of NLU signals First batch of NLU signals Jun 8, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jkamdjou jkamdjou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

l f g

signals/content/nlu_bec_high_conf.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
signals/content/nlu_bec_high_conf.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bfilar bfilar marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2023 18:46
@bfilar
Copy link
Member Author

bfilar commented Sep 12, 2023

Ready for review

@morriscode
Copy link
Member

These look good to me. The only thing I question is the use of Tags. None of the other signals have any tags on them, I'm not sure if those actually do anything, or if they're helpful in your model, or even if they work on signals, I assumed they would as it's probably the same schema, but I don't know.

@bfilar
Copy link
Member Author

bfilar commented Sep 18, 2023

that's a fair point. i should probably add them

@morriscode
Copy link
Member

that's a fair point. i should probably add them

these already have them, but none of the other signals do, if we're saying we want tags for all signals. The tags almost feel redundant to the name, which is why I think we didn't add them before.

If having tags helps you lets add them to all signals, but if it's just superficial lets remove them from this pr?

@bfilar
Copy link
Member Author

bfilar commented Sep 19, 2023

Oh I see what you're saying. Let's get them in as they could be useful indicators when observed with other signals

@bfilar
Copy link
Member Author

bfilar commented Oct 6, 2023

Based on internal testing from @rw-access this should be good to merge. Someone review & give a 👍

@rw-access
Copy link
Contributor

FWIW this PR wasn't blocked before testing and isn't now, so don't let me hold you up!

Copy link
Member

@morriscode morriscode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@bfilar bfilar merged commit a50d0c5 into main Oct 6, 2023
3 checks passed
@bfilar bfilar deleted the bfilar.nlu_signals branch October 6, 2023 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants