Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

subprotocol crates no_std support #1315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

Georges760
Copy link

common_messages_sv2 job_declaration_sv2 mining_sv2 template_distribution_sv2: remove the no_std feature and make them #![no_std] as they never use std anywhere.

  • bump their MAJOR version because of feature removal
  • bump the dependant crates PATCH version
  • updates docs

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 20, 2024

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchsubprotocols_no_std
Testbedsv2
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
client_sv2_handle_message_common📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
44.55
(-1.38%)
58.56
(76.08%)
client_sv2_handle_message_mining📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
77.01
(-1.28%)
104.17
(73.92%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14.67
(+0.05%)
14.71
(99.71%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
266.06
(-0.16%)
288.72
(92.15%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
609.47
(-0.50%)
645.72
(94.39%)
client_sv2_open_channel📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
172.08
(+4.20%)
177.50
(96.95%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
283.59
(-0.60%)
308.81
(91.83%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
379.62
(-1.02%)
408.25
(92.99%)
client_sv2_setup_connection📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
160.66
(+0.48%)
170.66
(94.14%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
466.66
(-0.96%)
551.05
(84.69%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,062.20
(+5.99%)
1,153.01
(92.12%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 20, 2024

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchsubprotocols_no_std
Testbedsv2
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkEstimated CyclesBenchmark Result
estimated cycles
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
1e3 x estimated cycles
(Limit %)
InstructionsBenchmark Result
instructions
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
instructions
(Limit %)
L1 AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
L2 AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
RAM AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
client_sv2_handle_message_common📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2.20
(+4.14%)
2.23
(98.57%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
473.00
(-0.05%)
488.92
(96.74%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
732.00
(-0.49%)
757.93
(96.58%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6.00
(+20.57%)
11.95
(50.21%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
41.00
(+6.36%)
41.62
(98.50%)
client_sv2_handle_message_mining📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8.32
(+1.23%)
8.38
(99.25%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,137.00
(-0.01%)
2,140.48
(99.84%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3,152.00
(-0.23%)
3,169.28
(99.45%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
40.00
(+12.55%)
41.79
(95.72%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
142.00
(+1.76%)
144.09
(98.55%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6.39
(+1.41%)
6.44
(99.12%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,750.00
(-0.02%)
1,766.19
(99.08%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,547.00
(-0.19%)
2,574.60
(98.93%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
19.00
(+11.30%)
24.23
(78.42%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
107.00
(+2.29%)
108.65
(98.48%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14.84
(+0.78%)
14.93
(99.35%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4,694.00
(-0.01%)
4,710.19
(99.66%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,748.00
(-0.12%)
6,785.72
(99.44%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
50.00
(+11.44%)
60.75
(82.30%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
224.00
(+1.26%)
226.44
(98.92%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
27.86
(+1.00%)
28.01
(99.47%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10,645.00
(+0.40%)
10,686.96
(99.61%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
15,500.00
(+0.44%)
15,574.62
(99.52%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
92.00
(+10.68%)
97.84
(94.03%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
340.00
(+1.40%)
342.54
(99.26%)
client_sv2_open_channel📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4.48
(+2.00%)
4.56
(98.37%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,461.00
(-0.02%)
1,476.92
(98.92%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,156.00
(-0.21%)
2,183.65
(98.73%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.00
(+23.67%)
13.54
(73.87%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
65.00
(+3.78%)
67.15
(96.80%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14.08
(+0.43%)
14.19
(99.19%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,064.00
(-0.00%)
5,079.92
(99.69%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,318.00
(-0.11%)
7,351.41
(99.55%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
43.00
(+19.44%)
47.14
(91.21%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
187.00
(+0.52%)
190.99
(97.91%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
22.85
(+0.73%)
23.00
(99.35%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8,040.00
(+0.11%)
8,053.90
(99.83%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11,689.00
(+0.05%)
11,711.17
(99.81%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
84.00
(+11.59%)
88.46
(94.96%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
307.00
(+1.10%)
311.17
(98.66%)
client_sv2_setup_connection📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4.74
(+1.13%)
4.79
(99.05%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,502.00
(-0.02%)
1,517.92
(98.95%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,276.00
(-0.10%)
2,299.53
(98.98%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.00
(+5.96%)
15.51
(64.49%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
69.00
(+2.22%)
70.06
(98.49%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
16.24
(+0.56%)
16.31
(99.57%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5,963.00
(-0.00%)
5,978.92
(99.73%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8,655.00
(-0.10%)
8,691.58
(99.58%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
47.00
(+17.52%)
54.12
(86.85%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
210.00
(+0.88%)
211.94
(99.08%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
35.77
(+0.51%)
35.90
(99.62%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14,888.00
(+0.16%)
14,912.40
(99.84%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
21,871.00
(+0.14%)
21,910.99
(99.82%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
105.00
(+12.69%)
116.29
(90.29%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
382.00
(+0.68%)
385.11
(99.19%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 20, 2024

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchsubprotocols_no_std
Testbedsv1
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
client-submit-serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,433.00
(-2.31%)
6,920.62
(92.95%)
client-submit-serialize-deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,270.30
(-2.16%)
7,846.96
(92.65%)
client-submit-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-submit-serialize-deserialize-handle📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,822.90
(-3.43%)
9,286.87
(84.24%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize-handle📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
880.37
(+1.54%)
940.26
(93.63%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
674.12
(-0.01%)
715.31
(94.24%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize/client-sv1-authorize-serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
246.91
(-0.86%)
269.95
(91.46%)
client-sv1-get-authorize/client-sv1-get-authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
158.19
(+0.45%)
166.31
(95.12%)
client-sv1-get-submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,250.80
(-1.79%)
6,750.11
(92.60%)
client-sv1-get-subscribe/client-sv1-get-subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
282.33
(+0.07%)
323.69
(87.22%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize-handle📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
758.20
(+4.16%)
781.12
(97.07%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
585.00
(-0.72%)
625.33
(93.55%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
209.35
(+1.37%)
224.06
(93.44%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 20, 2024

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchsubprotocols_no_std
Testbedsv1
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkEstimated CyclesBenchmark Result
estimated cycles
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
1e3 x estimated cycles
(Limit %)
InstructionsBenchmark Result
instructions
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
1e3 x instructions
(Limit %)
L1 AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
1e3 x accesses
(Limit %)
L2 AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
RAM AccessesBenchmark Result
accesses
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
accesses
(Limit %)
get_authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8.48
(+0.32%)
8.67
(97.78%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3.66
(-1.84%)
3.86
(94.85%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5.11
(-2.27%)
5.45
(93.77%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.00
(+23.31%)
15.60
(64.12%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
95.00
(+4.28%)
96.14
(98.82%)
get_submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
95.34
(-0.03%)
95.68
(99.65%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
59.26
(-0.26%)
59.71
(99.26%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
85.08
(-0.30%)
85.82
(99.14%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
43.00
(-2.96%)
59.75
(71.97%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
287.00
(+2.36%)
290.37
(98.84%)
get_subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7.96
(-0.56%)
8.23
(96.62%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2.76
(-2.16%)
2.94
(93.70%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
3.83
(-2.59%)
4.14
(92.48%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
13.00
(+6.67%)
20.22
(64.29%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
116.00
(+1.32%)
117.82
(98.46%)
serialize_authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
12.30
(+0.32%)
12.51
(98.33%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5.24
(-1.21%)
5.43
(96.56%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7.28
(-1.54%)
7.60
(95.72%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11.00
(+11.22%)
18.42
(59.73%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
142.00
(+3.06%)
142.43
(99.70%)
serialize_deserialize_authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
24.70
(-0.06%)
25.18
(98.07%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
9.79
(-0.80%)
10.02
(97.70%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
13.79
(-0.98%)
14.18
(97.23%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
33.00
(-7.29%)
45.58
(72.41%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
307.00
(+1.26%)
313.17
(98.03%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_authorize📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
30.32
(-0.00%)
30.72
(98.70%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11.99
(-0.57%)
12.19
(98.34%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
16.95
(-0.71%)
17.30
(97.98%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
57.00
(+2.50%)
66.98
(85.11%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
374.00
(+0.88%)
379.31
(98.60%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
126.48
(+0.02%)
126.78
(99.76%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
73.12
(-0.19%)
73.53
(99.44%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
104.76
(-0.24%)
105.49
(99.31%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
109.00
(+2.78%)
125.01
(87.19%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
605.00
(+1.28%)
608.21
(99.47%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
27.92
(+0.05%)
28.42
(98.25%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
9.58
(-0.62%)
9.76
(98.14%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
13.52
(-0.77%)
13.83
(97.72%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
66.00
(+2.84%)
77.29
(85.39%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
402.00
(+0.78%)
410.69
(97.88%)
serialize_deserialize_submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
115.22
(-0.02%)
115.71
(99.57%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
67.89
(-0.26%)
68.41
(99.24%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
97.36
(-0.32%)
98.28
(99.07%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
65.00
(+0.98%)
85.52
(76.00%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
501.00
(+1.67%)
501.92
(99.82%)
serialize_deserialize_subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
23.30
(-0.07%)
23.83
(97.77%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8.13
(-0.76%)
8.31
(97.77%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11.42
(-0.94%)
11.74
(97.29%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
38.00
(-1.30%)
50.23
(75.65%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
334.00
(+0.81%)
342.87
(97.41%)
serialize_submit📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
99.83
(+0.03%)
100.13
(99.69%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
61.33
(-0.23%)
61.73
(99.34%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
87.94
(-0.28%)
88.64
(99.20%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
47.00
(-0.91%)
65.78
(71.45%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
333.00
(+2.44%)
335.72
(99.19%)
serialize_subscribe📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
11.48
(+0.68%)
11.60
(98.93%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4.11
(-1.36%)
4.28
(95.97%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
5.69
(-1.79%)
6.00
(94.85%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
17.00
(+26.07%)
23.14
(73.47%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
163.00
(+2.95%)
163.65
(99.60%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Collaborator

@plebhash plebhash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey @Georges760 thanks for this

let's try to merge this PR before releasing v1.2.0

bumping MAJOR makes total sense

however some of the PATCH bumps are redundant since they've already been covered via #1300 in preparation for the release v1.2.0, so it would be redundant to bump 2x before publishing the crates to crates.io

we should rebase the PR to avoid bumping PATCH 2x on crates that have already been bumped via #1300, namely:

  • roles_logic_sv2
  • sv2_ffi

we should also squash a60cbcc for a cleaner commit history

plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being dropped via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be dropped soon
- no point in publishing docs for code under prop_test
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being dropped via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be dropped soon
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being dropped via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be dropped soon
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being dropped via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be dropped soon
- no point in publishing docs for code under prop_test
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being dropped via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be dropped soon
- no point in publishing docs for code under prop_test
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being dropped via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be dropped soon
- it is sufficient to publish the docs with with_buffer_pool feature flag
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being deprecated via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be deprecated soon
- no point in publishing docs for code under prop_test
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being deprecated via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be deprecated soon
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being deprecated via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be deprecated soon
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being deprecated via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be deprecated soon
- no point in publishing docs for code under prop_test
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being deprecated via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be deprecated soon
- no point in publishing docs for code under prop_test or disable_nopanic
plebhash added a commit to plebhash/stratum that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
publishing with all-features is overengineering:
- no_std is being deprecated via stratum-mining#1315
- with_serde will be deprecated soon
- it is sufficient to publish the docs with noise_sv2 and with_buffer_pool feature flags
…stribution_sv2`: remove the `no_std` feature and make them `#![no_std]` as they never use `std` anywhere.

- bump their MAJOR version because of feature removal
- bump the dependant crates PATCH version
- updates docs
@Georges760
Copy link
Author

hey @Georges760 thanks for this

let's try to merge this PR before releasing v1.2.0

bumping MAJOR makes total sense

however some of the PATCH bumps are redundant since they've already been covered via #1300 in preparation for the release v1.2.0, so it would be redundant to bump 2x before publishing the crates to crates.io

we should rebase the PR to avoid bumping PATCH 2x on crates that have already been bumped via #1300, namely:

  • roles_logic_sv2
  • sv2_ffi

we should also squash a60cbcc for a cleaner commit history

@plebhash done

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 19.29%. Comparing base (e8d76d6) to head (e7f152d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1315   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   19.29%   19.29%           
=======================================
  Files         164      164           
  Lines       10852    10852           
=======================================
  Hits         2094     2094           
  Misses       8758     8758           
Flag Coverage Δ
binary_codec_sv2-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
binary_serde_sv2-coverage 3.65% <ø> (ø)
binary_sv2-coverage 5.48% <ø> (ø)
bip32_derivation-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
buffer_sv2-coverage 25.02% <ø> (ø)
codec_sv2-coverage 0.01% <ø> (ø)
common_messages_sv2-coverage 0.13% <ø> (ø)
const_sv2-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
error_handling-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
framing_sv2-coverage 0.29% <ø> (ø)
jd_client-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
jd_server-coverage 7.79% <ø> (ø)
job_declaration_sv2-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
key-utils-coverage 2.39% <ø> (ø)
mining-coverage 2.51% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
mining_device-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
mining_proxy_sv2-coverage 0.70% <ø> (ø)
noise_sv2-coverage 4.35% <ø> (ø)
pool_sv2-coverage 1.38% <ø> (ø)
protocols 24.72% <ø> (ø)
roles 6.54% <ø> (ø)
roles_logic_sv2-coverage 8.08% <ø> (ø)
sv2_ffi-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
template_distribution_sv2-coverage 0.00% <ø> (ø)
translator_sv2-coverage 9.60% <ø> (ø)
utils 25.13% <ø> (ø)
v1-coverage 2.47% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Georges760 Georges760 requested a review from plebhash December 26, 2024 10:43
@plebhash plebhash merged commit a58246a into stratum-mining:main Dec 26, 2024
37 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants