-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove redundant Drop
implementation from ITF TemplateProvider
#1291
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1291 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 19.30% 19.30%
=======================================
Files 164 164
Lines 10849 10849
=======================================
Hits 2094 2094
Misses 8755 8755
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Bencher Report
Click to view all benchmark results
|
Bencher Report
Click to view all benchmark results
|
Bencher Report
🚨 4 Alerts
Click to view all benchmark results
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Damn... That's nice catch, for me its working fine now locally. ACK
204f77f
to
e94758b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tACK
replace #1290
close #1288
BitcoinD
already implements theDrop
traitthen we have a second
Drop
implementation forTemplateProvider
:stratum/roles/tests-integration/tests/common/mod.rs
Lines 167 to 171 in 5bcd54d
this is not only redundant, but likely the root cause of our problems here, since it calls RPC
stop
2x: