-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-15319 CIM regression KI #7296
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f6b65dc
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-15319 Regression KI
oafischer 5598611
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-15319
oafischer 980e85a
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-15319 CIM regression KI
oafischer 4971b0a
Open https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-15319 CIM regression KI
oafischer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be the BMH in the hub cluster, right?
cc @trewest
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is correct. This issue occurs when you remove the relevant spoke BMH from the hub cluster.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for catching that, updated!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@carbonin @trewest @oafischer -- for a simple known issue like this, we still need to ask ourselves what the user needs to know and when so that they don't have to stop and think: What did I miss?
Do not remove the
BareMetalHost
resource.If you already say that in the main documentation and they are still doing it, we need to make it clearer there and not here in the known issues.
You must reinstall the resource to get your nodes to run....
You can manually restart the nodes by....
Something to tell them how to get out of it or what the next step is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bug so ideally we would allow the user to remove that BMH and not have the node shut down so I don't think it makes sense for us to tell them not to remove the BMH in the main doc.
The user shouldn't need to reinstall anything to get the node back, just powering it back on will do the job, but we don't know anything about how they do power management outside of the BMO integration. But if you think it's valuable to say "power the node back on" then I think it's fine to put that here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the detailed explanation @carbonin. I'll add the part about powering the node back on. Let me know if that's sufficient @swopebe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The documentation should also prevent a bug; prevent a customer call. We also don't want to make the user have to stop and think what they did wrong or how they start over. @oafischer let me know what you decide to add here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed in meeting, I'll add the recovery step of powering the node back on, so that we don't have to remember to remove any notes in the main doc once this issue is fixed.