-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Call complete
listeners exclusively when the actor reaches its done status
#4609
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 984bdfa The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 984bdfa:
|
For "on stop", which is still an important "event" to listen for, we can just listen for the snapshot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked, and this PR removed the ability to listen for an actor stopping. I added code to enable this (tests pass locally, not sure why they're failing in CI), can you please review?
Why? 😉 Whenever I think about it, I always conclude that I wouldn't ever want to listen to it. I think it's important to back up the claim of its importance with some real-life use cases oriented on app development and their needs. |
related to #4608
this removes the ability to listen for "on stop" but
complete
was already not called in different scenarios for stopped snapshots:subscribe
hereSo this is currently inconsistent, one way or another, and we should unify it. When it comes to the "on stop" listener - personally, I just don't see a lot of use cases for it. A different modeling approach is always possible and I'd prefer to steer people towards explicit modeling and away from adding implicit ad-hoc logic in listeners like this.