-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix SmartLifecycle#stop #360
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
server/server/data/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/data/bootstrap/DataServerInitializer.java (1)
The stop() method in DataServerInitializer should delegate to DataServerBootstrap
The DataServerBootstrap has a comprehensive shutdown process that includes graceful shutdown, cleanup of servers, and proper resource handling. The DataServerInitializer's stop() method should delegate to DataServerBootstrap's destroy() method to ensure proper cleanup.
- In
DataServerInitializer.stop()
, calldataServerBootstrap.destroy()
before settingisRunning = false
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint 71-73
: Consider adding proper cleanup in stop()
The stop() method only sets the isRunning flag without performing any cleanup. This could lead to resource leaks or incomplete shutdown.
Let's check if dataServerBootstrap has a stop method that should be called:
Consider implementing proper cleanup in the following order:
- Stop accepting new requests
- Wait for in-flight requests to complete
- Release resources
- Set isRunning to false
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for stop method in DataServerBootstrap
ast-grep --pattern 'class DataServerBootstrap {
$$$
stop() {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if we can find the DataServerBootstrap class definition
rg -l "class DataServerBootstrap"
# Then let's look for any stop-related methods in data server related files
rg -A 5 "void stop\(\)" --type java server/server/data/
# Let's also check for cleanup or shutdown related methods
rg -A 5 "(cleanup|shutdown)" --type java server/server/data/
Length of output: 3899
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of DataServerBootstrap to understand its shutdown mechanism
cat server/server/data/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/data/bootstrap/DataServerBootstrap.java
# Let's also check if there are any resources that DataServerInitializer manages
rg -B 5 "class DataServerInitializer" --type java server/server/data/
Length of output: 17012
server/server/session/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/session/bootstrap/SessionServerInitializer.java (1)
Line range hint 42-45
: Enhance stop() method robustness
The current stop() implementation lacks exception handling and proper synchronization. This could lead to inconsistent state if destroy() fails.
Consider implementing these improvements:
@Override
public void stop() {
+ if (!running.compareAndSet(true, false)) {
+ return; // Already stopped or stopping
+ }
- this.running.set(false);
- sessionServerBootstrap.destroy();
+ try {
+ sessionServerBootstrap.destroy();
+ } catch (Exception ex) {
+ LOGGER.error("Error during session server shutdown", ex);
+ throw ex; // Propagate to container
+ }
}
This ensures:
- Atomic transition of lifecycle state
- Single shutdown execution
- Proper error handling and logging
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- server/server/data/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/data/bootstrap/DataServerInitializer.java (1 hunks)
- server/server/meta/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/meta/bootstrap/MetaServerInitializerConfiguration.java (1 hunks)
- server/server/session/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/session/bootstrap/SessionServerInitializer.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
server/server/meta/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/meta/bootstrap/MetaServerInitializerConfiguration.java (1)
75-77
:
Review callback execution order in stop(Runnable callback)
The current implementation executes the callback before performing the actual stop operations. This could be problematic if the callback depends on the server still being in a running state. Consider moving the callback execution after the stop() call to ensure proper shutdown sequence.
Apply this diff to fix the execution order:
@Override
public void stop(Runnable callback) {
- callback.run();
stop();
+ callback.run();
}
Let's verify if this pattern is consistent across other initializers:
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ public boolean isAutoStartup() { | |||
@Override | |||
public void stop(Runnable runnable) { | |||
runnable.run(); | |||
this.isRunning = false; | |||
stop(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Incorrect implementation of SmartLifecycle#stop callback ordering
The current implementation executes the callback before completing the stop procedure, which violates Spring's SmartLifecycle contract. The callback should only be executed after the bean has fully stopped to ensure proper shutdown sequencing of dependent beans.
Apply this fix to ensure correct shutdown order:
@Override
public void stop(Runnable runnable) {
- runnable.run();
stop();
+ runnable.run();
}
Additionally, consider enhancing the stop() method to properly cleanup resources:
@Override
public void stop() {
+ try {
+ // Add cleanup logic here if needed
+ dataServerBootstrap.stop();
+ } finally {
this.isRunning = false;
+ }
}
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
@@ -74,6 +74,6 @@ public int getPhase() { | |||
@Override | |||
public void stop(Runnable callback) { | |||
callback.run(); | |||
this.running.set(false); | |||
stop(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Incorrect order of operations in stop(Runnable callback)
The current implementation executes the callback before stopping the server, which violates the Spring Framework's SmartLifecycle contract. The callback should only be executed after the shutdown is complete to properly signal completion to the container.
Apply this diff to fix the order:
@Override
public void stop(Runnable callback) {
- callback.run();
stop();
+ callback.run();
}
This ensures that:
- The server is fully stopped first
- The callback is executed only after shutdown is complete
- The container is properly notified of the completion
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
stop(); | |
stop(); | |
callback.run(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
server/server/data/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/data/bootstrap/DataServerInitializer.java (1)
Line range hint 65-67
: Enhance stop() method with proper cleanup and error handling
The current stop() implementation only sets the running flag without properly cleaning up resources. This could lead to resource leaks, especially since dataServerBootstrap is started but never stopped.
Consider implementing a more robust stop() method:
@Override
public void stop() {
+ try {
+ if (isRunning) {
+ dataServerBootstrap.stop();
+ this.isRunning = false;
+ }
+ } catch (Throwable ex) {
+ LOGGER.error("Error stopping Data server", ex);
+ throw new RuntimeException("Could not stop Data server", ex);
+ }
- this.isRunning = false;
}
This implementation:
- Ensures proper cleanup of resources
- Maintains symmetry with start() method
- Includes appropriate error handling and logging
- Guards against multiple stop attempts
server/server/meta/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/meta/bootstrap/MetaServerInitializerConfiguration.java (1)
Line range hint 52-55
: Add logging to the stop() method.
For consistency with the start() method which has logging, consider adding logging to the stop() method as well.
Consider adding logging:
@Override
public void stop() {
+ LOGGER.info("Stopping MetaServer components...");
this.running.set(false);
metaServerBootstrap.destroy();
+ LOGGER.info("MetaServer components stopped");
}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- server/server/data/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/data/bootstrap/DataServerInitializer.java (1 hunks)
- server/server/meta/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/meta/bootstrap/MetaServerInitializerConfiguration.java (1 hunks)
- server/server/session/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/session/bootstrap/SessionServerInitializer.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
server/server/data/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/data/bootstrap/DataServerInitializer.java (1)
43-43
: Verify consistent implementation across server components
Let's verify that these changes are consistently applied across all server initializers and that the bootstrap components support proper shutdown.
Also applies to: 65-67
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to gather more information about the shutdown implementations.
This should help us better understand the shutdown patterns across different components and verify consistency.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Consistent shutdown implementation confirmed across server components
The stop() implementation in DataServerInitializer is consistent with other server components. All server initializers (Data, Meta, Session) implement SmartLifecycle and follow the same shutdown pattern:
- All have both stop() and stop(Runnable) methods
- All properly manage their running state
- Meta and Session initializers additionally call destroy() on their respective bootstrap components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other server initializers have similar patterns
echo "Checking other server initializers implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements SmartLifecycle {
$$$
public void stop(Runnable $_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
echo "\nVerifying bootstrap components have stop methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Bootstrap {
$$$
public void stop() {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 443
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for stop method implementations in server components
echo "Checking stop method implementations..."
rg "public void stop" -A 5
echo "\nChecking SmartLifecycle implementations..."
rg "implements SmartLifecycle" -A 10
echo "\nChecking Bootstrap class implementations..."
rg "class.*Bootstrap" -A 10
Length of output: 22806
server/server/meta/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/meta/bootstrap/MetaServerInitializerConfiguration.java (1)
76-77
: Verify consistent implementation across server initializers.
Since similar changes were made to DataServerInitializer and SessionServerInitializer, we should verify that they implement the SmartLifecycle contract correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to find the server initializer implementations.
All server initializers implement SmartLifecycle correctly
Based on the search results, all three server initializers (Meta, Session, and Data) implement the SmartLifecycle interface with consistent patterns:
- Each has both
stop()
andstop(Runnable)
methods - The
stop(Runnable)
implementations correctly call the callback before stopping - The stopping logic is similar across all implementations, setting a running flag to false
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check SmartLifecycle implementations in other server initializers
# Expected: Find similar patterns that might need the same fixes
# Search for SmartLifecycle implementations
echo "Searching for SmartLifecycle implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $$$SmartLifecycle$$$'
# Search for stop(Runnable) implementations
echo "Searching for stop(Runnable) implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'public void stop(Runnable $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 336
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for server initializer classes and their lifecycle methods
echo "Searching for server initializer classes..."
rg -l "ServerInitializer"
echo -e "\nSearching for stop method implementations..."
rg -A 5 "public void stop\("
echo -e "\nSearching for SmartLifecycle interface usage..."
rg -A 2 "implements.*SmartLifecycle"
Length of output: 9340
server/server/session/src/main/java/com/alipay/sofa/registry/server/session/bootstrap/SessionServerInitializer.java (1)
Line range hint 1-76
: LGTM! The overall SmartLifecycle implementation follows good practices.
The implementation demonstrates:
- Thread-safe state management using AtomicBoolean
- Proper error handling and logging
- Clear lifecycle management
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ public boolean isAutoStartup() { | |||
@Override | |||
public void stop(Runnable runnable) { | |||
runnable.run(); | |||
this.isRunning = false; | |||
stop(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: SmartLifecycle contract violation in stop(Runnable) implementation
The current implementation violates the SmartLifecycle contract by executing the callback before stopping the component. This can lead to race conditions and break Spring's shutdown coordination mechanism.
According to Spring's SmartLifecycle contract:
- The component should first perform its shutdown logic
- Then execute the callback to signal completion to dependent beans
- The callback execution allows Spring to coordinate shutdown across multiple SmartLifecycle beans based on their phases
Here's the correct implementation:
@Override
public void stop(Runnable callback) {
- callback.run();
- stop();
+ stop();
+ callback.run();
}
This ensures:
- Component is properly stopped before signaling completion
- Dependent beans can safely proceed with their shutdown
- Spring's shutdown coordination mechanism works as intended
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
stop(); | |
stop(); | |
callback.run(); |
stop(); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix the order of operations in stop(Runnable).
The current implementation violates Spring's SmartLifecycle contract. According to the contract, the stop operation should be performed before executing the callback. This ensures that the component is fully stopped before notifying the container.
Apply this diff to fix the order:
@Override
public void stop(Runnable callback) {
- callback.run();
stop();
+ callback.run();
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
stop(); | |
} | |
stop(); | |
callback.run(); | |
} |
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and logging for the stop operation.
The stop operation lacks error handling and logging. If either the stop() call or callback execution fails, it could leave the system in an inconsistent state.
Consider implementing with proper error handling and logging:
@Override
public void stop(Runnable callback) {
+ LOGGER.info("Stopping MetaServer...");
+ try {
stop();
+ LOGGER.info("MetaServer stopped successfully");
callback.run();
+ } catch (Exception ex) {
+ LOGGER.error("Error during MetaServer shutdown", ex);
+ throw ex;
+ }
}
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
@@ -74,6 +74,6 @@ public int getPhase() { | |||
@Override | |||
public void stop(Runnable callback) { | |||
callback.run(); | |||
this.running.set(false); | |||
stop(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix the order of operations in stop(Runnable).
The current implementation executes the callback before stopping the server, which violates the SmartLifecycle contract. The callback should be invoked after the shutdown is complete to properly signal completion to Spring's lifecycle management.
Apply this diff to fix the order:
@Override
public void stop(Runnable callback) {
- callback.run();
stop();
+ callback.run();
}
This ensures that:
- The server is properly stopped first
- The callback is executed after shutdown is complete
- Spring's lifecycle management can properly track the shutdown status
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
stop(); | |
stop(); | |
callback.run(); |
Motivation:
fix SmartLifecycle#stop
Modification:
fix SmartLifecycle#stop
Result:
fix SmartLifecycle#stop
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
stop()
method, enhancing consistency and reliability during shutdown.Refactor
stop
method implementations across multiple server initializer classes to improve code maintainability and reduce redundancy.