Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CassandraSinkCluster: switch to dashmap #1230

Closed

Conversation

conorbros
Copy link
Member

I found the benchmarks too noisy to determine if this actually results in a speedup but it's reasonable to assume it does at least make it a bit faster. And since we brought in the dep for Kafka sink cluster might as well use it here.

@conorbros conorbros requested a review from rukai June 30, 2023 05:45
@rukai
Copy link
Member

rukai commented Jul 4, 2023

I'll review this once I have windsock cassandra benches running on AWS, should take a few days.

@rukai
Copy link
Member

rukai commented Aug 4, 2023

I did 3 bench runs for this and all 3 times the results were clearly saying this PR regressed performance.
e.g.
image

I would still like to keep this PR open until I can resolve the benching noise so I can use verifying the performance of this PR as a goal to get windsock working properly.
Feel free to mark as draft and stop maintaining it in the mean time though.

@conorbros conorbros marked this pull request as draft August 4, 2023 04:12
@conorbros
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, interesting results.

@conorbros conorbros force-pushed the cassandrasinkcluster-dashmap branch from e4f3c02 to 54de1b0 Compare August 22, 2023 01:31
@conorbros conorbros force-pushed the cassandrasinkcluster-dashmap branch from 54de1b0 to 2aed152 Compare January 25, 2024 05:39
@conorbros
Copy link
Member Author

I checked this again, it's still a clear regression.

@conorbros conorbros closed this Jan 31, 2024
@conorbros conorbros deleted the cassandrasinkcluster-dashmap branch May 23, 2024 00:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants