Improved the Cobertura coverage report

[jhoffland]

The format of the Cobertura report did not match the Cobertura document definition. For example in some cases, the required attribute name of package and the required attribute signature of method was empty.
Resulting in tools like Jenkins not being able to interpret the report.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #957 (c99f329) into 9.2 (709ee60) will decrease coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is 98.81%.

❗ Current head c99f329 differs from pull request most recent head f0a6126. Consider uploading reports for the commit f0a6126 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                9.2     #957      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     84.29%   84.11%   -0.18%     
- Complexity     1178     1235      +57     
============================================
  Files            59       65       +6     
  Lines          4215     3519     -696     
============================================
- Hits           3553     2960     -593     
+ Misses          662      559     -103     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/Report/Cobertura/CoberturaLine.php	93.33% <93.33%> (ø)
src/Report/Cobertura/CoberturaClass.php	98.07% <98.07%> (ø)
src/Report/Cobertura/CoberturaCoverage.php	99.00% <99.00%> (ø)
src/Report/Cobertura.php	57.14% <100.00%> (-39.97%)	⬇️
src/Report/Cobertura/CoberturaElement.php	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Report/Cobertura/CoberturaMethod.php	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Report/Cobertura/CoberturaPackage.php	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Driver/Driver.php	85.71% <0.00%> (-2.53%)	⬇️
src/Report/Xml/Report.php	93.54% <0.00%> (-2.20%)	⬇️
...c/StaticAnalysis/ExecutableLinesFindingVisitor.php	97.00% <0.00%> (-1.91%)	⬇️
... and 36 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[jhoffland]

Hi @sebastianbergmann, what is the best way to get this PR reviewed and merged?

[sebastianbergmann]

This branch cannot be rebased due to conflicts.

[sebastianbergmann]

This branch cannot be rebased due to conflicts.

I hope to have time next week to look into this.

[jhoffland]

This branch cannot be rebased due to conflicts.

Yesterday I merged the 9.2 branch into the branch of this PR and resolved the merge conflicts.

I hope to have time next week to look into this.

That would be nice! Thanks in advance.

[sebastianbergmann]

Yesterday I merged the 9.2 branch into the branch of this PR and resolved the merge conflicts.

GitHub disagrees:

This branch cannot be rebased due to conflicts

Sorry :(

[jhoffland]

My apologies for the confusion. I just squased the commits and rebased the branch.

[jhoffland]

Is there something I can do to get this PR merged? I think everything is ready now.

[sebastianbergmann]

Nothing right now, I just need to find the time to review it.

[Zjmainstay]

Is there any new progress on this PR? Need this fix.

[sebastianbergmann]

I am sorry, but I cannot look at this before the conflicts are resolved.