Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

arXiv submission draft branch #194

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor

I'd adjusted this feature branch so that a tarball created in the following manner is successfully processed to produce a preview PDF in the arXiv system: tar -czvf scipy-ms.tar.gz scipy-1.0

Maybe check for issues in that preview (if you can see it). Their Tex Submission Instructions do contain some points we might improve upon, like reference handling, but not sure this is worth draining time on.

Anyway, good to have more than one set of eyes before we try to submit irreversibly.

* remove / adjust tracked files in
scipy 1.0 manuscript folder in preparation
for upload to arXiv
* adjustments to repo based on tracebacks
from arXiv processor

* restore missing style file wlscirep.cls &
place in project root; likewise for jabbrv.sty;
likewise for jabbrv-ltwa-all.ldf and
jabbrv-ltwa-en.ldf
@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Don't merge this -- was supposed to be a draft-only branch..

@mdhaber
Copy link
Contributor

mdhaber commented Jul 22, 2019

@tylerjereddy Link to preview PDF doesn't work because I'm not the "submitter of that submission"

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

How about this PDF attachment to the GitHub comment:
scipy-arxiv-preview1.pdf

@stefanv
Copy link
Member

stefanv commented Jul 23, 2019

I gave it a quick scan, and it looks good; we also have the option to upload a v2 later on. Thank you, Tyler.

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

alright, perhaps I'll aim to upload tomorrow if I don't see any specific objections

@mdhaber
Copy link
Contributor

mdhaber commented Jul 23, 2019

Looks good!

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I've submitted to arXiv--it is now processing and scheduled to be announced on Thursday July 25 if everything goes well.

I forwarded the pertinent email to the paper committee people, I think

@apbard
Copy link
Contributor

apbard commented Jul 23, 2019

Thanks @tylerjereddy!
Could you please forward the emails also to all other authors? Nothing special but I just would like to follow the process on arxiv and (hopefully) Nature Methods.

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

tylerjereddy commented Jul 25, 2019

Co-authors should be able to claim ownership on the arXiv posting, which is now up here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10121

I'm hoping @mdhaber will help me distribute the link / password to the appropriate people.

@mdhaber
Copy link
Contributor

mdhaber commented Jul 25, 2019

@tylerjereddy Sure thing; I can send an email to all the authors - and to the mailing list, if you'd like.
(For the email to the authors - how would I get the password? Did you already register me as an author, because it already appears to be linked to my account.)

@larsoner
Copy link
Member

I just registered on arXiv and do not currently own the paper, so I'm happy to be a guinea pig for the link/text before sending out to other co-authors

@ev-br
Copy link
Member

ev-br commented Jul 25, 2019

The corresponding author should have received an email which looked like this:

Your submission submit/2768618 has been assigned the permanent arXiv
identifier 1907.10121 and is available at:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10121


The paper password for this article is: XXX

This paper password is meant to be used by coauthors for claiming ownership of the preprint.

(Feel free to contact me off-list for navigating around arxiv UI).

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes @mdhaber should have a copy of that email from last night -- it includes the password

@mdhaber
Copy link
Contributor

mdhaber commented Jul 25, 2019

Ah I see you forwarded it. Thanks. Will need to do it later today, though.

@tylerjereddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mdhaber Do you propose that we "backport" some recent fixes in master branch into this arxiv submission branch & then proceed with submitting a revised preprint?

@mdhaber
Copy link
Contributor

mdhaber commented Sep 6, 2019

Yes, if possible I'd backport everything that has been merged since the original submission.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants