ISMLExtendedAttributeProvider

[budak7273]

Any modded asset can implement this interface to offer gameplay tags to other things

To test, run the example chat command and check your logs. The Example Item should show up as a special descriptor and the tag it has will be printed.

See this WIP docs page for usage info: https://docs-dev.ficsit.app/satisfactory-modding/latest/Development/ModLoader/ExtendedAttributeProvider.html

[budak7273]

This should probably be squashed once it's ready

[Th3Fanbus]

For posterity, Robb just recalled there's a blocker: https://discord.com/channels/555424930502541343/562722670974599227/1253145838415253625

Once your asset is created, add it to the GameplayTagTableList in the Project Settings menu and all tags contained within it will be added to the Gameplay Tag Manager.

ah yes this was the wall

[mircearoata]

Since SML has c++, and this tag is used in c++, it makes more sense to register it using native tags, with the new UE5 macros, rather than registering it in a config file and using the find function every time.

In the .h: SML_API UE_DECLARE_GAMEPLAY_TAG_EXTERN(TAG_SML_Registry_Item_SpecialItemDescriptor)
In the .cpp: UE_DEFINE_GAMEPLAY_TAG_COMMENT(TAG_SML_Registry_Item_SpecialItemDescriptor, "SML.Registry.Item.SpecialItemDescriptor", "comment goes here")
return ItemTags.HasTag(TAG_SML_Registry_Item_SpecialItemDescriptor);

[budak7273]

Sounds good, but we should then add a tag to examplemod using the config file approach. Any ideas for what that tag could be?

[Th3Fanbus]

Given Mircea's comments, what does 9040461 even do?

[budak7273]

The new recipe (named "Testing for chat command /exampleListSpecial") and change to the schematic is a consequence of how the demo chat command works, I am open to changing it but not sure what a better example would be.

The chat command gets the "get obtainable item descriptors" SML utility, but normally there aren't any craftable Special items, so the only item that would appear in the response is the Example Item. The recipe only exists to have something else (that doesn't use the tag provider) show up in that list for comparison

Maybe we should have ExampleMod define its own tag and restructure the example command to check for items with that tag? (see here)

[budak7273]

Also, have we figured out a way to add tags to items that we don't control? For example, adding a tag to a base-game item.

[budak7273]

This system will not be used in favor of the currently-in-progress Content Tag Registry being developed on the same branch (see https://discord.com/channels/555424930502541343/1268324829463969832)