Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use ProcessPrng on Windows #415
Use ProcessPrng on Windows #415
Changes from 4 commits
6766018
9fa83b5
22635a8
0ba324e
c231147
796321e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's unfortunate to have this ugliness without the program that generated it to confirm that it actually created this ugliness. However, I also think it's fine because of how
repr(transparent)
works so it isn't the end of the world.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a good point. For both APIs I didn't directly use the output of
windows-bindgen
, but instead took that output as a starting point, then deleted lines until I got code that looked decent.I think that referencing
windows-bindgen
in the comments at all was misleading, so I changed the comments to just reference the API metadata names directly. Given that, I also changed theBOOL
/BOOLEAN
types to just be typedefs (which is more honest IMO).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, here's the full output for running
windows-bindgen
with the following arguments: