Document automatic installation behavior via rustup show
#2797
Conversation
|
I'm torn on this - I haven't even read the patch yet, but see #2686 and #1397 This patch is documenting things we consider bugs. It is good to have the current behaviour documented, OTOH then folk may remember what they read and not-re-read the docs after we fix those bugs. perhaps a note to the effect that this is under review or something, and a link to the bugs? |
Add a note for it. Thanks for the review, I didn't notice that it was considered a bug. 🤣 |
|
Also, I'm not sure that if it's considered a bug, then we should still document it. Because @kinnison his original idea was to let people know about the behavior and use it in CI. But if it is a bug, will it have a big impact on users when it is fixed? |
|
yeah, CI users will use 'rustup ensure' or whatever verb we end up on.' |
|
@rbtcollins @kinnison Should I close the PR or is this clarification acceptable for now? (I don't currently recommend it in the description for use in CI) |
close #2639