-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 267
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create SVP spend tx hash unsigned storage entry #2699
Create SVP spend tx hash unsigned storage entry #2699
Conversation
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ public enum BridgeStorageIndexKey { | |||
|
|||
SVP_FUND_TX_HASH_UNSIGNED("svpFundTxHashUnsigned"), | |||
SVP_FUND_TX_HASH_SIGNED("svpFundTxHashSigned"), | |||
SVP_SPEND_TX_HASH_UNSIGNED("svpSpendTxHashUnsigned"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we put the same name as the one that appears in the RSKIP?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer how you did it to be consistent with the naming convention of the rest of the entries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good question, if we keep this name we need to update the RSKIP. Let's check with @julia-zack when she's back
a6a59b0
to
1c84a9d
Compare
ceddc6a
to
9a6b09e
Compare
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
f9c3c6a
into
feature/powpeg_validation_protocol-phase2
Description
Just as we did with the fund transaction unsigned hash, we need to save the spend transaction hash to be able to identify it when trying to register it later.
Motivation and Context
https://github.com/rsksmart/RSKIPs/blob/master/IPs/RSKIP419.md