Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug DFBUGS-934: [release-4.15-compatibility] Tough-cookie: prototype pollution in cookie memstore #1720

Conversation

GowthamShanmugam
Copy link
Contributor

@GowthamShanmugam GowthamShanmugam changed the title Bug 2304972: [release-4.15] CVE-2023-26136 odf-multicluster-console-container: tough-cookie: prototype pollution in cookie memstore Bug 2304972: [release-4.15-compatibility] CVE-2023-26136 odf-multicluster-console-container: tough-cookie: prototype pollution in cookie memstore Nov 26, 2024
@alfonsomthd
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve

@alfonsomthd
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@GowthamShanmugam
Copy link
Contributor Author

GowthamShanmugam commented Dec 12, 2024

/retitle Bug DFBUGS-934: [release-4.15-compatibility] Tough-cookie: prototype pollution in cookie memstore

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title Bug 2304972: [release-4.15-compatibility] CVE-2023-26136 odf-multicluster-console-container: tough-cookie: prototype pollution in cookie memstore Bug DFBUGS-934: [release-4.15-compatibility] Tough-cookie: prototype pollution in cookie memstore Dec 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid jira ticket of any type label Dec 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 12, 2024

@GowthamShanmugam: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-934](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-934), which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (odf-4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (odf-4.15.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DFBUGS-934

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that the referenced jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting label Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: PrasadDesala.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@GowthamShanmugam: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-934](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-934), which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (odf-4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (odf-4.15.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @PrasadDesala

In response to this:

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DFBUGS-934

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

…ontainer: tough-cookie: prototype pollution in cookie memstore

Signed-off-by: Gowtham Shanmugasundaram <[email protected]>
@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Dec 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 15, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alfonsomthd, bipuladh, GowthamShanmugam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/test odf-console-e2e-aws

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 1c830ba into red-hat-storage:release-4.15-compatibility Dec 15, 2024
6 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 15, 2024

@GowthamShanmugam: [Jira Issue DFBUGS-934](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-934) is in an unrecognized state (MODIFIED) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DFBUGS-934

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved jira/valid-bug Indicates that the referenced jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid jira ticket of any type lgtm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants