Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

controllers: read the storageclusterpeer name from annotation #2923

Merged

Conversation

rewantsoni
Copy link
Member

instead of listing the storageclusterpeer, read the name from the annotation on storage-client-mapping config

instead of listing the storageclusterpeer, read the name from
the annotation on storage-client-mapping config

Signed-off-by: Rewant Soni <[email protected]>
@rewantsoni
Copy link
Member Author

/jira backport release-4.18

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rewantsoni: The following backport issues have been created:

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.18

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@openshift-ci-robot: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.18 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

@rewantsoni: The following backport issues have been created:

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.18

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@nb-ohad
Copy link
Contributor

nb-ohad commented Dec 5, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nb-ohad, rewantsoni

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 5, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f3c1b94 into red-hat-storage:main Dec 5, 2024
11 checks passed
@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #2925

In response to this:

@rewantsoni: The following backport issues have been created:

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.18

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants