Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

controllers: use k8s pointer util #2428

Merged

Conversation

jarrpa
Copy link
Member

@jarrpa jarrpa commented Jan 29, 2024

Huge thanks to @malayparida2000 for finding this over a year ago. 😆

Signed-off-by: Jose A. Rivera [email protected]

Waiting on #2385

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 29, 2024
@jarrpa jarrpa force-pushed the jarrpa/pointer-vars branch 2 times, most recently from 56038dc to 28087c3 Compare January 29, 2024 19:49
@@ -926,7 +927,6 @@ func copyManifests() {

func getUXBackendServerDeployment() appsv1.DeploymentSpec {
replica := int32(1)
ptrToTrue := true
deployment := appsv1.DeploymentSpec{
Replicas: &replica,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

possibly another candidate?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair! Good catch.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 1, 2024
@jarrpa jarrpa force-pushed the jarrpa/pointer-vars branch from 28087c3 to 48b855b Compare February 2, 2024 17:09
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 2, 2024
@jarrpa jarrpa force-pushed the jarrpa/pointer-vars branch from 48b855b to 495672f Compare February 2, 2024 17:12
@jarrpa jarrpa marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2024 17:13
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 2, 2024
@jarrpa jarrpa requested a review from leelavg February 2, 2024 18:24
@nb-ohad
Copy link
Contributor

nb-ohad commented Feb 4, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 5, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jarrpa, leelavg, nb-ohad

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@leelavg
Copy link
Contributor

leelavg commented Feb 5, 2024

/retest-required

@jarrpa
Copy link
Member Author

jarrpa commented Feb 5, 2024

/retest

2 similar comments
@jarrpa
Copy link
Member Author

jarrpa commented Feb 5, 2024

/retest

@jarrpa
Copy link
Member Author

jarrpa commented Feb 6, 2024

/retest

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 73ef95a into red-hat-storage:main Feb 6, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants