Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make array type printing consistent with base #854

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

simeonschaub
Copy link
Contributor

print_type was missing a space inside the curly brackets. (My IDE
automatically removed trailing whitespace here, lmk if I should remove
those changes.)

`print_type` was missing a space inside the curly brackets. (My IDE
automatically removed trailing whitespace here, lmk if I should remove
those changes.)
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.41%. Comparing base (3dfdcee) to head (49c92ac).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #854      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.38%   84.41%   +1.02%     
==========================================
  Files          46       50       +4     
  Lines        4634     4677      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits         3864     3948      +84     
+ Misses        770      729      -41     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rafaqz
Copy link
Owner

rafaqz commented Nov 10, 2024

I think base added that space a few years ago? I kind of don't like spaces in types but yeah, let's standardise.

You will need to run the doctests with fix=true to pass those tests

@simeonschaub
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think base added that space a few years ago?

Yes, it was changed in JuliaLang/julia#37085

@rafaqz rafaqz merged commit 29a6b99 into rafaqz:main Nov 11, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants