Fix resource ID examples #1011
Merged
Fix resource ID examples #1011
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The examples on the API concepts page are wrong, because they are missing the `providers` segment. This acts as the delimiter between the root scope and resource type. The explanations are still OK. I don't think we need to describe `providers` in detail for users to get the point.
AaronCrawfis
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The examples on the API concepts page are wrong, because they are missing the
providerssegment. This acts as the delimiter between the root scope and resource type.The explanations are still OK. I don't think we need to describe
providersin detail for users to get the point.Thank you for helping make the Radius documentation better!
Auto-generated description
copilot:all
Issue reference