Emphasize S3-S4 difference in recommendation for how to fix class_equals_linter() #2688
+9
−8
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MichaelChirico
changed the title
|
Looks like there's on ongoing outage for |
|
How do you feel about a more subtle nudge by mentioning |
|
It crossed my mind, but OTOH I don't see a big benefit to being overly parsimonious with the lint description, and the comment I received was that they had totally glanced over |
AshesITR
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per experience here:
Rdatatable/data.table#6603 (comment)
I think it's good to more strongly recommend
is()only for S4 classes.