[Draft - Likely Needs Work] Leniency Checker #315
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Oops this pull request was made before I refactored the singleplayer/multiplayer code and the conflict resolution is gonna be kind of complicated so i'm going to make a new branch and copy over the changes |
|
renamed parameter from leniency to strictness because higher values correspond to more strict answer checking |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This depends on the following pull request to be approved: qbreader/qb-answer-checker#8
This attempts to create a slider that adjusts how strict the answer checker is, such that a leniency value of$n$ allows 1 mistake every $n$ characters.
This is my first time working with the nitty gritty parts of the repo (rather then just adding, like the testing), so some extra eyes would be much appreciated.