-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gpib: send the proper byte when using command #276
Open
MatthieuDartiailh
wants to merge
13
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
gpib-commands
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
06cc143
gpib: send the proper byte when using command
MatthieuDartiailh 669608e
update release notes
MatthieuDartiailh 13316ce
gpib: use board controller as appropriate in gpib_control_ren
MatthieuDartiailh 0fb86e4
gpib: try to fix control_ren
MatthieuDartiailh 247e372
gpib: handle device secondary address
MatthieuDartiailh 8baabf3
gpib: fix command value
MatthieuDartiailh b19ec39
gpib: fix int to bytes conversion
MatthieuDartiailh 48328ce
gpib: fix handling of addresses in control ren
MatthieuDartiailh 58e5b7f
gpib: more fixes
MatthieuDartiailh 933ed7e
gpib: grab GPIBCommands definition from pyvisa
MatthieuDartiailh e35e81e
appease linters
MatthieuDartiailh 3f394bf
fix more linter issues
MatthieuDartiailh 8b49388
fix mypy complaint about static methods
MatthieuDartiailh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this even be allowed? (writing specifically about the 0x01 command here, but I guess this applies to most of the other stuff this function does) The user might not expect every instrument on their GPIB bus to go into local mode when they call a function on a single instrument. I think it's better to only expose
gpib_control_ren()
for bus controller objects. This way the user is forced to understand that they're doing something that impacts the whole bus. See #278 for a problem with that today.I think sending a single instrument to local mode should be done with
ibloc()
because that's a device action, not a bus action. I don't seeibloc()
exposed anywhere in pyvisa-py right now though.