Add a battery model reference page to the documentation

[kratman]

Description

This change adds a new page with links to battery modeling papers in the fundamentals section of the user guide. When I first went through the tutorials, I noticed that the references were at the end of the notebooks. However, I felt it would have been nice to have easy access to some of the articles before going through the tutorials. This way users, like myself, that are new to battery modeling can download the papers side by side with the tutorials on how to run the models.

Right now the page is only a single paragraph and 6 links, but it can be expanded if other users find it useful. I included two review articles, two lithium-ion battery articles, and two lead-acid battery models.

Type of change

Documentation updates only.

Key checklist:

• No style issues: $ pre-commit run (or $ nox -s pre-commit) (see CONTRIBUTING.md for how to set this up to run automatically when committing locally, in just two lines of code)
• All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --all (or $ nox -s tests)
• The documentation builds: $ python run-tests.py --doctest (or $ nox -s doctests)

You can run integration tests, unit tests, and doctests together at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick (or $ nox -s quick).

Further checks:

• Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

[rtimms]

thanks @kratman , nice idea!

[kratman]

This was closed by accident, I restored the branch

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.06% ⚠️

Comparison is base (e4cb2a4) 99.60% compared to head (c32f8ea) 99.55%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head c32f8ea differs from pull request most recent head 03158b3. Consider uploading reports for the commit 03158b3 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3327      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    99.60%   99.55%   -0.06%     
===========================================
  Files          253      253              
  Lines        19546    19553       +7     
===========================================
- Hits         19469    19466       -3     
- Misses          77       87      +10     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kratman]

Sorry, missed that the https://doi.org URLs were ignored by Lychee, but not https://www.doi.org

I think this will pass CI the next round if it is triggered again

[brosaplanella]

The lychee error seems unrelated to this PR so merging it.

[brosaplanella]

@all-contributors please add @kratman for code (this is for an old PR I forgot to add this)

[allcontributors]

@brosaplanella

I've put up a pull request to add @kratman! 🎉