FE: Add topic params to support MSK Tiered Storage

[tobernguyen]

• Breaking change? (if so, please describe the impact and migration path for existing application instances)

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

• Add topic params to support MSK Tiered Storage (closes Allow users to specify a custom topic parameter (ie., local.retention.bytes) #4247)

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

• Do I miss adding something else to support this? (eg, docs and tests)

How Has This Been Tested? (put an "x" (case-sensitive!) next to an item)

• No need to
• Manually (please, describe, if necessary)
• Unit checks
• Integration checks
• Covered by existing automation

Checklist (put an "x" (case-sensitive!) next to all the items, otherwise the build will fail)

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (e.g. ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES)
• My changes generate no new warnings (e.g. Sonar is happy)
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged

Check out Contributing and Code of Conduct

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

[github-actions]

Hello there tobernguyen! 👋

Thank you and congrats 🎉 for opening your first PR on this project! ✨ 💖

We will try to review it soon!