Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos #109

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024
Merged

Fix typos #109

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

omahs
Copy link
Contributor

@omahs omahs commented Jun 2, 2024

Fix typos

@arnaucube
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @omahs, thanks for this PR (and these other typo-fixing-PRs too catalystdao/catalyst#85 skip-mev/connect#473, omni-network/omni#1156, SocketDotTech/socket-DL#373, gpt-engineer-org/gpt-engineer#1164, ...)

Since we use https://github.com/crate-ci/typos to automate this kind of task, and there are some typos that the tool missed, would be great to add them to typos to prevent future repetitions of the same typo (for us but also for the rest of the community using it).
Would you mind adding them to https://github.com/crate-ci/typos so the next release includes them?

@omahs
Copy link
Contributor Author

omahs commented Jun 3, 2024

@arnaucube Hey, sure! Good idea, I'll add them there!

Copy link
Collaborator

@arnaucube arnaucube left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just saw your additions to the typos repo, thank you very much!
Since it was included in the last release of typos, the efficitently -> efficiently was already detected by the CI in this repo in another PR 🎉

@arnaucube arnaucube added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into privacy-scaling-explorations:main with commit bda8ad6 Jun 5, 2024
5 checks passed
dmpierre pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2024
* fix typos

* fix typo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants