Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds details of Funds Locking and Unlocking #20

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ckartik
Copy link
Contributor

@ckartik ckartik commented Mar 13, 2024

  • WIP

@@ -62,3 +62,10 @@ In the event that a provider fails to include a committed transaction (txnj) in
3. The Oracle communicates that txnj was not seen in the Oracle Contract.
4. The Oracle Contract, upon receiving this information, initiates the slashing procedure. This involves penalizing the provider by triggering a slash event, which results in the forfeiture of the stake held by the provider contract as a guarantee of honest behavior.
5. The confiscated stake is subsequently allocated to the bidder as compensation for the provider's failure to include the committed transaction, thereby ensuring that the bidder is recompensed for the provider's breach of trust.

## Funds Locking
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this part of the oracle description?

## Funds Locking
We offer a mechanism for locking and unlocking funds associated with a pre-confirmed bid.

Funds movement involves locking the bid amount in escrow when a commitment is processed. This occurs only once per bid, meaning if there are multiple commitments for the same bid, the funds will be locked only once.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this how it is implemented? The solution we had discussed locks the deposited amount until the oracle settles and not when commitments are processed.

@Dogandi
Copy link
Collaborator

Dogandi commented Jun 5, 2024

@ckartik is this still WIP? If not lets close it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants