-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
52__transcript.txt
6045 lines (6045 loc) · 166 KB
/
52__transcript.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
- Welcome to the Huberman Lab Podcast,
where we discuss science,
and science based tools for everyday life.
I'm Andrew Huberman,
and I'm a professor of
neurobiology and ophthalmology
at Stanford School of Medicine.
Today, my guest is Jeff Cavaliere.
Jeff Cavaliere holds a Master
of Science in Physical Therapy
and is a certified strength
and conditioning specialist.
He did his training at the
University of Connecticut Storrs,
one of the top five programs in the world
in physical therapy and sports medicine.
I discovered Jeff
Cavaliere over 10 years ago
from his online content.
His online content
includes information about
how to train for strength,
how to train for hypertrophy,
which is muscle growth,
how to train for endurance,
as well as how to rehabilitate injuries
to avoid muscular imbalances,
nutrition and supplementation.
I've always found his content
to be incredibly science
based, incredibly clear,
sometimes surprising, and
always incredibly actionable.
It is therefore not surprising
that he has one of the
largest online platforms
for fitness, nutrition, supplementation,
and injury rehabilitation.
Jeff has also worked
with an enormous number
of professional athletes
and has served as head physical therapist
and assistant strength
coach for the New York Mets.
Again, the content that Jeff
Cavaliere has posted online
has been so immensely
useful to me over the years,
that I was absolutely thrilled
to get the chance to sit down with him
and ask him about
everything from how to train
in terms of how to split up the body parts
that you train across the week,
how to integrate strength
training and endurance training,
when to stretch, how to stretch.
Indeed, we talked about nutrition,
we talk a bit about supplementation.
We talk about how to really
avoid creating imbalances
in muscle and in neural
control over muscle.
This is one thing that's
really wonderful about Jeff is
he really has an
understanding of not just how
muscles and bones, and tendons
and ligaments work together,
but how the nervous system
interfaces with those.
We talked about the
mental side of training,
including when to bring
specific concentration
to the muscles that you're training,
and when to think more about
how to move weights through space
and think more about
the movements overall.
I'm certain that you'll find
the conversation that we held
to be immensely useful and informative
for your fitness practices
and also for how you mentally
approach fitness in general,
and how to set up a
lifelong fitness practice,
one that will give you the
strength that you desire,
one that will give you
the aesthetic results
that you desire.
One that will set you up for endurance
and cardiovascular health,
basically an overall fitness program.
I really feel this is
where Jeff Cavaliere shines
above and beyond so many of the other PTs
and fitness so-called
influencers that are out there.
Again, everything is grounded in science,
everything is clear, and
everything is actionable.
And while we do cover an
enormous amount of information
during today's episode,
if you want to dive even
deeper into that information,
you can go to athleanx.com,
where you'll find some of Jeff's programs.
You can also find him
at Athlean-X on YouTube.
There you'll find videos for instance,
like the, how to repair or
heal from lower back pain.
Something that I actually
followed directly
long before I ever met Jeff,
has over 32 million views,
and that is not by accident, it's because
the protocols there again are
surprising and actionable.
They relieved my back pain
very quickly without surgery.
So I'm immensely grateful
for that content.
And it extends into everything from again,
hypertrophy, endurance and
strength training and so on.
Again, it's athleanx.com as the website,
Athlean-X on YouTube, and
also @athleanx on Instagram.
The Huberman Lab Podcast
is proud to announce that
we've partnered with
Momentous Supplements.
We've done that for several reasons.
First of all,
the quality of their
supplements is exceedingly high.
Second of all,
we wanted to have a location
where you could find
all of the supplements discussed
on the Huberman Lab Podcast
in one easy to find place.
You can now find that place
at livemomentous.com/huberman.
In addition, Momentous
Supplements ship internationally,
something that a lot of
other supplement companies
simply do not do.
So that's terrific whether
or not you live in the US,
or you live abroad.
Right now, not all of the supplements
that we discuss on the Huberman
Lab Podcast are listed,
but that catalog of
supplements is being expanded
very rapidly,
and a good number of them
that we've talked about,
some of the more prominent
ones for sleep and focus
and other aspects of
mental and physical health
are already there.
Again, you can find them at
livemomentus.com/huberman.
Before we begin,
I'd like to emphasize that
this podcast is separate
from my teaching and
research roles at Stanford.
It is however, part of
my desire and effort
to bring zero cost to consumer
information about science
and science related tools
to the general public.
In keeping with that theme,
I'd like to thank the
sponsors of today's podcast.
Our first sponsor is Athletic
Greens, now called AG1.
I started taking AG1 way back in 2012.
So I'm delighted that they're
sponsoring the podcast.
The reason that I started taking AG1,
and the reason I still
take AG1 twice a day,
is that it covers all of my
foundational health needs
for mental health, physical
health, and performance.
As I mentioned earlier, it
has vitamins and minerals
that cover any deficiencies
I might have in my diet.
It also has probiotics,
and the probiotics are key
for supporting the
so-called gut microbiome.
The gut microbiome are trillions
of little microbacteria
that live in our gut from our throat
all the way down to the base of our gut,
that support everything
from our immune system
to our hormone health, to the
so-called gut brain access.
That is, our gut and our brain
are in direct communication
with one another in ways
that support our mood,
our ability to think,
and overall brain health.
If you'd like to try Athletic Greens,
you can go to athleticgreens.com/huberman
to claim a special offer.
They'll give you five free travel packs,
which make it very easy
to mix up Athletic Greens
while you're on the road,
and they'll give you a year
supply of vitamin D3+K2.
Vitamin D3 and K2 are essential
for an enormous number of aspects
of your mental health, physical
health, and performance
by impacting things
like hormone regulation,
calcium regulation, and
cardiovascular health.
Again, go to athleticgreens.com/huberman
to claim that special offer.
Today's episode is also
brought to us by Eight Sleep.
Eight Sleep makes smart
mattress covers with heating
and sleep tracking and
importantly cooling capacity.
I've talked many times
before on this podcast
or another podcast about
the close relationship
between temperature and sleep.
That is, your body temperature
has to drop by about
one to three degrees in
order to fall asleep,
and waking up involves
heating up of your body
by about one to three degrees.
Now, some people run
cold during the night.
They need to heat their
sleeping environment.
Other people run too hot during the night.
I'm one such person,
I tend to wake up in
the middle of the night
if I get warm at all.
With Eight Sleep, I'm able to
cool my sleeping environment
in a very precise way,
even so precise that I can
control the temperature
at the beginning, middle,
and end of the night
so that I fall asleep
easily, stay deeply asleep,
and wake up feeling better
than I've ever felt before.
The Pod Pro Cover by Eight Sleep
is their most advanced
solution on the market
for thermal regulation.
It pairs dynamic, cooling and heating
with biometric tracking
if you want to use that.
Also it has this nice feature
that it'll vibrate in the
morning to wake you up.
I'd rather like that
vibration feature too.
You can add the cover to any mattress
and start sleeping as cool
as 55 degrees Fahrenheit,
or as hot as 110 degrees Fahrenheit.
So again, it can be customized
to your sleep needs.
If you want to try Eight Sleep,
you can go to eightsleep.com/huberman
and check out the Pro Pod Cover
and save $150 at checkout.
They currently ship
within the USA, Canada,
and the United Kingdom.
Again, that's eightsleep.com/huberman
to save $150 at checkout.
Today's episode is also
brought to us by ROKA.
ROKA makes eyeglasses and sunglasses
that are of the absolute highest quality.
The company was founded by two,
all American swimmers from Stanford
and everything about ROKA
eyeglasses and sunglasses
is made with performance in mind.
That said, the aesthetics of
ROKA eyeglasses and sunglasses
is superb.
I've spent a lifetime
working on the biology
of the visual system.
And I can tell you that your visual system
has to contend with an
enormous number of challenges
in order to be able to see clearly.
ROKA understands this
and has developed their
eyeglasses and sunglasses
in a manner such that when
you move from say a shady area
to a brightly lit area,
or when you are in different
lit environments indoors,
you can always see with crystal clarity.
And they won't slip off if you sweat.
In fact, they were originally
designed for exercise.
You can wear them while
running or cycling,
but they have a terrific aesthetics.
So unlike a lot of so-called
performance or exercise glasses
that are out there that
make people frankly
look like cyborgs in my opinion,
ROKA eyeglasses and
sunglasses look terrific.
You'd be proud to wear them
to work, or out to dinner,
or when you exercise.
If you want to try ROKA
glasses, you can go to roka.com.
That's R-O-K-A.com and
enter the code Huberman
to save 20% off on your first order.
Again, that's ROKA, R-O-K-A.com
and enter the code Huberman at checkout.
And now for my discussion
with Jeff Cavaliere.
Jeff, such a pleasure
for me to have you here.
- I'm glad to be here, it's amazing.
- I'm a longtime consumer of your content.
I've learned a tremendous
amount about fitness,
both in the weight room and cardio,
nutrition things that I've
applied for over a decade.
So for me, this is
particularly meaningful.
And my goal here is really
to ask a bunch of questions
to which I'm interested in the answers,
but also for which I know
the audience is really curious about.
So one of your mantras is,
"If you want to look like an
athlete, train like an athlete"
and I think that's something
really special that sets aside
what you do from what a lot of other
very well qualified people do.
And in terms of the use
of weights and resistance,
whether or not it's body
weight or weights in the gym,
or pulleys versus cardio,
in terms of overall health
aesthetics and athleticism,
is there a way that you could point to
the idea that maybe people should be doing
50% resistance training and 50% cardio,
maybe it's 70/30, maybe it's 30/70.
And here I'm talking
about the typical person
who would like to maintain, or maybe even
add some muscle mass,
probably in particular
areas for most people,
as opposed to just overall mass.
Although we'll talk about that later,
and people who want to maintain
a relatively low body fat percentage
and be in good cardiovascular health.
What's the sort of
contour of a basic program
that anybody could think
about as a starting place?
- I think it's like a 60/40 split,
which would be leaning towards
weight training, strength
and then the conditioning
aspect be about 40%.
So if you look at it over a
course of a training week,
I mean, five days in a
gym would be a great task.
And obviously not in the gym,
it could be done at home.
But three days strength training,
Monday, Wednesday, Friday.
Conditioning, Tuesday,
Thursday, you know, two days.
It's a pretty easy roundabout
way to split that up,
of course, depending upon training goals.
And as you said, the
aesthetic goals like that
will shift dramatically.
But if you want to see
the benefits of both,
that's probably the effect
of dose for strength training
and the effect of dose for conditioning
at the bare minimum level.
Again, being a much better
performer conditioning wise,
you're going to want to do more than that.
- And in terms of the
duration of those workouts,
what's your suggestion?
I've been weight training
for about 30 years,
running for about 30 years,
and mainly for health.
And have found that if
I work hard in the gym
or at resistance training for
more than 60 minutes or so,
it's very hard for me to
recover, I start getting cold,
I start getting weaker
from workout to workout,
but amazingly, at least to me,
if I keep those workouts to
about 10 minutes of warmup
and 55 minutes or so of really hard work
for resistance training,
and I keep the cardiovascular work
to about 30 or 45 minutes, I feel great.
And I seem to make some progress,
at least someplace in the
workout from workout to workout.
- Yeah, I mean, those are good numbers,
'cause those are kind of
numbers that we usually preach.
We try to keep our workouts to
an hour or less if possible.
Now, depending upon the
split that you're following,
if you're on a total body split,
there's just going to be
more that has to be done
in a given amount of time.
And again if you're training
primarily for strength,
that could prolong the workout,
'cause of the longer rest
time is in between sets.
But in general, when you're
not focused on that one aspect,
but the overall health picture,
then you can get the job
done in under an hour.
And again, I always say, on top of
"If you want to look like an
athlete train, like an athlete,"
is, "You could either train
longer or you could train hard,
but you can't do both."
And I really believe
that the focus for me,
I have a busy life,
I have a lot of other things
that I do believe it or not.
And it's like, I want to go
hard and I want to go get out.
And I find that my body
also responds to that,
and I think a lot of guys'
body respond to that.
And particularly as
you start to get older,
I think it's the length of the workout
that actually causes more problems
than the intensity of what you're doing.
Particularly if you're warmed
up properly like you said.
I've found personally that my warmup
has had to become more of an
integral part of my workout
than it ever has before.
I could get in the gym when I was 20,
and I'm going right over, I'm
doing the one set, two sets,
I'm ready to go.
You know, and I never do
another workout warmup set
for any of the other exercise
I do the rest of the day.
That's not true anymore.
And I found that as long as I'm willing
to sort of give myself a
little bit of a warmup,
the intensity is not what bothers me.
I'm very much in control
of the weights that I use
and it doesn't bother me.
But if I start to go pretty long,
I start to feel achy or
I start to have problems.
So again, depending upon age,
that also plays a factor in the length.
But again, I think everybody can achieve,
on a standard program,
can achieve the results that
they want within an hour.
- In terms of splits,
you mentioned splits.
And so for those who aren't
familiar with this term splits,
it's really which body
parts are you training on?
Which days?
Seems like almost
everybody follows a weekly
workout schedule.
Although the body of course
doesn't care about the week.
There's no reason thing
that once every seven days
or twice every seven days
makes sense physiologically,
it's just the body doesn't work that.
But, that's the way life is structured.
I've seen you discuss three days a week,
whole body workouts.
I've heard of splits
like a pushing one day,
pulling another day, legs
another day, a day off, repeat.
I mean, there's so many
variations on this.
What are some general themes
that we can throw out there?
And in order to avoid the
huge matrix of possibilities,
you have some wonderful
content that points those.
And we will cap-
In our caption show notes,
we'll link out to some of those
that different ways to design splits.
But in terms of giving people a logic
of how to think about
splitting up body parts,
what's governing the split?
What are the rules and the
logic that dictate a split?
- For me, the first rule
is will you stick to it?
Like if you, 'cause there are split,
I don't particularly
like full body splits.
And I was actually talking to Jesse
about that the other day like,
I don't necessarily like to
have to train everything.
Now of course the volumes will
come down per muscle group.
But if you don't like to do that,
and you actually don't look
forward to your workout
because you're dreading
having to do everything
and feeling maybe too fatigued
by the time your workout's over,
or the fact that those generally
do take a little bit longer
and don't fit into your schedule.
I don't care how effective the split is,
a split not done is not effective.
So you need to find one that fits.
So maybe you go into
an alternative option,
like a push-pull-legs, like you mentioned.
And that could be done either
one cycle through the week,
on a Monday, Wednesday, Friday split,
or it could be twice in a week.
So you're actually training six times,
where you repeat it,
pull-push-legs, pull-push-legs,
or however you want to do it
with either a day off in
between the three days,
or at the end of the six days.
And again, that actually
impacts your schedule.
I've broken that down before where it's,
if you put it in between the three days,
it's good because you're giving
yourself an extra rest day
in between, but it starts
to shift that day off
every week as we wrap around.
So for those guys that we're choosing
that seven day schedule out
of convenience in our heads,
it starts to mess with that off day.
So others like to just
keep it predictably,
let's say on a Sunday, and
train six days in a row.
But that's a better way
to maybe group similar
muscle actions together, which I think,
I definitely prefer that,
because if I'm going to be
training pulling movements,
at least there there's
a synergy between them.
And I feel like I'm looking
to achieve one goal that day.
And then, I mean, quite honestly,
you can go back to the bro-split days,
and those still work effectively.
There's a reason why
they worked in the past.
I think that science shows
that there's smarter ways
to do them these days.
Like you can come back
and hit a related muscle,
so you could do, let's
say biceps on one day
and then come back two
days later and do back,
realizing again, synergy
between the exercises there,
your biceps are going to
get re-stimulated again.
So you could figure out
ways to make that work,
but the thing that I
think is effective there,
is that tends to be one of the ones
that people like the most.
Because they can go in, they
get their pump, they feel good.
It's pretty solely focused
on one muscle group.
- Is that the definition of a bro-split?
One...
- One muscle group a day?
- Yeah, I see, so it's
very much geared towards
strength and aesthetics
really maximizing...
- Probably more aesthetics
than strength, yeah.
You're just...
- Hence the bro, the bro name.
- But again, like, you know,
in here I am a science guy
and I could appreciate the
benefits of a bro-split.
Especially 'cause again, like to what end?
Who's goal are we trying to achieve here?
Those are ours.
Like if I'm applying my
standards and my goals
or even like athletic ideals,
but they just want to get in shape,
then it's perfectly fine to do
a bro split in that instance,
if you're sticking to it again
and you're seeing the results
that you want to see from it.
But they're able to really
keep their focus on one muscle,
they get to focus on.
Look, a lot of times people struggle with
the way of an exercise feels
until their second or third set.
Like they don't have that
proper percept of ability
to kind of lock in on an exercise.
So spending a few, not only
sets in the same exercise,
but then doing another exercise
for the same muscle group
helps them to dial in a little bit better
and get more out of their training.
- Yeah, that raised a really interesting,
I think important question.
Early on when I started
resistance training,
which was when I was 16 in high school,
I got in touch with and I was
learning from Mike Menzer.
- Me too, that's crazy.
- And Mike was very helpful.
Very, very helpful.
We got to be friendly...
- So, I just read his book,
I didn't get a chance to be
him, so I'm jealous, right?
- Well, back then no internet,
I paid by Western Union type
thing to send him some money
- From the back of the magazine.
- And then he got on the phone with me
and my mother at the time was like,
why is this grown man calling the house?
And he gave me a very
straightforward split,
which was shoulders, arms one day,
he had me taking two days
off and then training legs
and then two days off and then
chest and back, et cetera.
- And that's a variation
of a bro-split too.
Where you're sort of
breaking them down that way,
chest them back or chest
them bis, you know?
- And it worked very well for me,
I probably would've,
because of my age I think,
and because I was untrained,
I think, largely untrained,
I think it would've grown
on many different programs,
but it worked very well for me.
I eventually just made that
in every other day thing.
Shoulders and arms day
off, legs day or two off,
'cause if you hit legs
right, at least for me,
I'm not training the next day.
And then I'm not doing
much of anything athletic
the next day, and chest,
back and repeat and so on.
And the reason I found that helpful
is I almost always
recovered between workouts.
The six day a week
program of push-pull-legs,
push-pull-legs, to me seems excruciating
from two standpoints.
One is, at least with
my recovery abilities,
or lack of recovery abilities,
I can't imagine coming back feeling fresh.
And the other one is,
if I'm in the gym more
than four days a week,
I really start to fatigue it
about the whole psychological
experience of it.
Whereas if I'm in there
three or four days a week.
In other words, if I put a day
off in between each workout,
I really want to be there.
And I get in there with a lot of fire.
And I'm also doing other
things on the off days.
So I think that, I love that you mentioned
the split that you'll stick to.
And that you can bring the intensity to,
because I think that
that's really important.
I sometimes hear about two a day training.
I've done two a day training
twice in my lifetime,
both times I got sick two days later.
That's correlation, not causation.
But is there ever an
instance where two a day
weight training makes sense
for the non-drug assisted,
typical recovery ability person?
- Actually, I think it makes
sense in some scenarios,
but it doesn't make sense practically
for a lot of people's schedules.
So like if you could break down,
let's say you were going to do even
some version of a total body session,
or maybe like you're going to
do an upper lower split, right?
You could do an upper workout
and do the anterior chain
or the pushing portion
of that in one session
and then come back and do
the pulling session later on
at night, if you had the opportunity to.
The thing that you benefit from there
is the freshness of focus.
Again, like something
in my head is sacrificed
by the time you get
towards the latter half
of whatever workout you're in.
To the same point you made before like,
when you start to approach
that 50 minutes an hour mark,
you are either losing
focus, you're losing energy,
you're losing contract viability,
you're losing something.
And if you're relegating whatever it is,
the pulling portion of that
to the end of that workout,
something suffers so that,
and if they realize that's happening,
then maybe you switch them up
the next time you do the workout
where the pulling portion of
the upper workout goes first,
and then the pushing goes later,
so you're at least not
just continuing that cycle,
but at the same time,
if you were able to kind of split them up,
you get a chance to kind of take a break,
you could have that
freshness of focus again,
and you could actually
get a better effort in,
'cause again, I think
effort drives the results.
So if the effort is not compromised,
then you should be able to do that.
But systemically is that a problem?
And I think that it is a
problem for a lot of people.
It's just hard to,
it's hard to rev the engine
up a lot of times in the day.
You warm that thing up once,
it's like that car in the
winter, you get it going once,
you're lucky, okay,
now you got to drive
it the rest of the day.
But you put it in the garage
and try to start it the
next day, it's a problem.
So, you know, young people
can get away with it
a lot more than older people could.
- Well, I've never had a
strong recovery quotient,
but if I stick to this
one day off in between,
every once in a while, two
days in a row training,
maybe because I have to travel
and I want to make sure
I get all the workouts
and kind of thing, I seem to be okay.
I like your example of warming up the car,
spoken like a true east coaster,
or those of us are on the west coast,
I took a moment there,
but we folks from the East
Coast and the Midwest, get it,
and certainly from Europe.
In terms of the mixing up
of cardiovascular training
and resistance training,
same day, different day,
which one should come first,
which one should come second?
If one main goals, again,
everyone listening has
different goals are,
most people would like to either maintain
or gain some muscle.
I don't know many people
that want to lose muscle.
To maintain or gains some muscle,
usually in specific
locations on their body,
most people would like to be
a bit leaner or a lot leaner.
There are a few people out there that are
either naturally lean or don't want,
or actually just want to gain weight.
But assuming that people
want to get leaner,
put on some muscle, maintain muscle,
and want to have a healthy
heart and a healthy brain,
which basically requires a
healthy cardiovascular system,
how would you incorporate
cardiovascular work
into the overall weekly regimen?
- So again, I think that the bare minimum
is probably twice a week
in terms of cardiovascular.
If you want to have some semblance
of cardiovascular conditioning.
But I think most people
who actually need it more
or want to pursue it more than that
are going to need more time to do that.
So at some point it can't just
be relegated to a day off,
or a day off from the
weight training workouts.
So at some point it has
to occur on the same day.
And in that case, I just like to put it,
if that is, you're not your primary goal,
but you're looking more for
the, just the overall picture,
the aesthetics you mentioned,
putting muscle on in certain areas,
then I would put it at
the end of the workout.
'Cause you don't want
it in any way compromise
the weight training work out.
And as we've sort of referenced
a couple times already,
the intensity of those
workouts is important.
And we know there's a strength component
to those workouts also that is going to
be a helpful stimulus for growth.
So the conditioning, the cardio,
that stuff done prior to any training,
strength training, workout,
is likely going to impair your ability
to perform at your best.
So unless it's just done
for a quick little warmup
in the beginning,
but then it's not sustained
long enough really to be
a benefit for cardiovascular conditioning.
So I just like to put that at the end,
realizing that even if
my effort level is lower,
my output is lower,
if it's still placing a
demand on my cardiac output
to get that conditioning
effect because I'm fatigued,
it still has a demand
on my cardiac output,
so it's still achieving its goal,
but it didn't interfere with my main goal
of being able to increase
my performance in the gym.
- Got it.
And in terms of the form
of cardiovascular training,
I've seen you do a number of,
I have to say very impressive
high intensity interval type work.
So burpee type work,
or pushups with crunches mixed into them,
anyway, people can see your videos,
I didn't describe those in the best way,
but rather than on the treadmill
or out jogging for 30-45 minutes,
is that because you
prefer higher intensity,
higher heart rate type training,
or is it because you
live in cold Connecticut,
and you don't want to be