Speed up start up time #12
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Dockerfile, package.json, and GitHub workflow files for a Node.js application. The Dockerfile has been modified to eliminate the global installation of Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
Dockerfile (3)
13-17: Optimize build process and reduce image size.While compiling TypeScript during build is more efficient than runtime compilation, we can further optimize the process:
COPY tsconfig.json ./ COPY src src # Build TypeScript files -RUN npm run build +RUN npm run build && \ + # Remove source files and devDependencies after build + rm -rf src && \ + npm prune --productionThis change will:
- Remove source files after compilation
- Remove devDependencies after build
- Reduce final image size
21-22: Add HEALTHCHECK instruction for container monitoring.While switching to compiled JavaScript will improve startup time, consider adding a health check to ensure the service is running correctly:
# Run compiled JavaScript instead of TypeScript +HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s --start-period=5s --retries=3 \ + CMD wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://localhost:8000/health || exit 1 CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"]
21-22: Consider additional startup optimizations.While compiling TypeScript improves startup time, consider these additional optimizations:
- Add Node.js optimization flags:
-CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"] +CMD ["node", "--optimize_for_size", "--max_old_space_size=460", "dist/server.js"]
- Consider using PM2 in production for process management and automatic restarts:
-CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"] +RUN npm install pm2 -g +CMD ["pm2-runtime", "dist/server.js"]These changes can further improve startup time and runtime performance while ensuring better process management in production.
package.json (1)
8-9: Consider enhancing the build scripts for better developer experience.While the current setup works for production, consider adding these helpful scripts:
"scripts": { "build": "tsc", "start": "node dist/server.js", + "dev": "ts-node src/server.ts", + "watch": "tsc --watch", + "clean": "rm -rf dist", + "build:clean": "npm run clean && npm run build", "test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1" },This would provide:
dev: Quick development with ts-nodewatch: Auto-recompilation during developmentclean: Clean build artifactsbuild:clean: Fresh build
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Dockerfile(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
8-9: LGTM! The changes align with the goal of improving startup time.
The addition of build and start scripts implements the TypeScript to JavaScript compilation strategy, which should improve startup performance by eliminating runtime TypeScript compilation.
8-9: Verify the build setup with existing dependencies.
Let's ensure the new build configuration works correctly with the project structure and dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Build configuration is properly set up and aligned with the project structure
The build setup in package.json is correctly configured:
tsconfig.jsonis present with proper configuration- Source root is correctly set to
srcdirectory - Output directory is set to
distas referenced in the start script server.tsexists at the expected locationsrc/server.ts- TypeScript source files are properly organized under the
srcdirectory
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify TypeScript configuration and source files
# Check if tsconfig.json exists and its content
if [ -f tsconfig.json ]; then
echo "Found tsconfig.json:"
cat tsconfig.json
else
echo "Warning: tsconfig.json not found"
fi
# Look for TypeScript source files
echo -e "\nTypeScript source files:"
fd -e ts -E "node_modules"
# Verify server.ts location
echo -e "\nLocating server.ts:"
fd "server.ts" -E "node_modules"
Length of output: 2207
| # Run compiled JavaScript instead of TypeScript | ||
| CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The dist directory and compiled files are missing
The verification reveals that while the TypeScript configuration and source files are properly set up (src/server.ts exists and tsconfig.json specifies dist as output directory), the dist directory with compiled JavaScript files is missing. The Dockerfile attempts to run dist/server.js which doesn't exist yet.
- The TypeScript build needs to be executed before running the application
- Add a build step in the Dockerfile before the CMD instruction:
RUN npm run build CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"]
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the existence of compiled files before execution.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the server.js file is mentioned in tsconfig.json output paths
# and if the health endpoint is implemented
# Check tsconfig.json output configuration
echo "Checking TypeScript output configuration..."
cat tsconfig.json | jq -r '.compilerOptions.outDir'
# Look for health endpoint implementation
echo "Checking health endpoint implementation..."
rg -l "app\.(get|use)\(['\"]\/health['\"]" src/
Length of output: 473
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the TypeScript setup and compiled files
# Check if tsconfig.json exists and its content
echo "=== TypeScript Configuration ==="
fd -t f "tsconfig.json" -x cat {}
# Check if dist directory exists and list its contents
echo -e "\n=== Dist Directory Content ==="
fd . "dist" || echo "dist directory not found"
# Check for server.ts or similar entry point files
echo -e "\n=== Server Entry Points ==="
fd -t f "server.ts" "index.ts" "main.ts" "app.ts" "src"
# Check package.json for build scripts
echo -e "\n=== Build Configuration ==="
fd "package.json" -x cat {} | jq '.scripts'
Length of output: 2094
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/vuln-scan.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-27: Consider adding Docker layer cachingThe workflow could benefit from Docker layer caching to speed up the build process, especially since this PR focuses on improving startup time.
Consider adding Docker layer caching:
name: build on: workflow_dispatch: pull_request: jobs: signer: name: Build and Scan Signer runs-on: ubuntu-22.04 steps: - name: Checkout code uses: actions/checkout@v3 + - name: Set up Docker Buildx + uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v2 + + - name: Cache Docker layers + uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: /tmp/.buildx-cache + key: ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-${{ github.sha }} + restore-keys: | + ${{ runner.os }}-buildx- - name: Build an image run: | - docker build -t signer . + docker buildx build \ + --cache-from type=local,src=/tmp/.buildx-cache \ + --cache-to type=local,dest=/tmp/.buildx-cache-new \ + --load \ + -t signer . + + - name: Move cache + run: | + rm -rf /tmp/.buildx-cache + mv /tmp/.buildx-cache-new /tmp/.buildx-cache.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml (1)
Line range hint
61-67: Consider publishing scan results as Security AdvisoryThe current configuration is robust with appropriate severity levels and vulnerability types. To enhance security visibility, consider adding a step to publish scan results as GitHub Security Advisory.
Add this step after the Trivy scan:
- name: Upload Trivy scan results uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v2 if: always() with: sarif_file: 'trivy-results.sarif'And modify the Trivy step to output SARIF:
uses: aquasecurity/[email protected] with: image-ref: ${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }}:latest - format: 'table' + format: 'sarif' + output: 'trivy-results.sarif' exit-code: '1' ignore-unfixed: true vuln-type: 'os,library' severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/vuln-scan.yml(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)Dockerfile(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Dockerfile
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/vuln-scan.yml (1)
18-18: Verify the Trivy action version upgrade
The version upgrade from 0.21.0 to 0.28.0 is a good improvement, but let's ensure we're using the most optimal version.
Let's verify the version and compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Version 0.28.0 is currently the latest stable release
The verification shows that version 0.28.0 (released on October 15, 2024) is indeed the latest stable release of the Trivy action. While we couldn't automatically verify the breaking changes and parameter compatibility due to API limitations, the version being used is current and appropriate.
Since this is a security scanning tool, using the latest stable version is a good practice to ensure you have the most recent vulnerability definitions and fixes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version, breaking changes, and parameter compatibility for aquasecurity/trivy-action
# Get the latest release version
echo "Latest release version:"
gh api repos/aquasecurity/trivy-action/releases/latest --jq .tag_name
# Check for breaking changes in the changelog between 0.21.0 and current version
echo -e "\nBreaking changes between 0.21.0 and current version:"
gh api repos/aquasecurity/trivy-action/contents/CHANGELOG.md --jq .content | base64 -d | awk '/## \[0\.2[1-8]\./ {p=1}; p; /## \[0\.21\.0\]/ {exit}' | grep -i "breaking"
# Verify if the current parameters are still valid in the action.yml
echo -e "\nVerifying parameter compatibility:"
gh api repos/aquasecurity/trivy-action/contents/action.yml --jq .content | base64 -d | grep -A 1 -E "image-ref:|format:|exit-code:|ignore-unfixed:|vuln-type:|severity:"
Length of output: 832
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using direct GitHub API calls and jq for parsing JSON
# Get the latest release version and compare with 0.28.0
echo "Latest release version check:"
gh api repos/aquasecurity/trivy-action/releases/latest --jq '.tag_name, .published_at'
# Get the action.yml content directly and parse with jq
echo -e "\nVerifying input parameters in action.yml:"
gh api repos/aquasecurity/trivy-action/contents/action.yml --jq '.content' | \
tr -d '\n' | \
jq -R 'split(".") | .[0] | @base64d' | \
grep -A 1 -E "image-ref:|format:|exit-code:|ignore-unfixed:|vuln-type:|severity:"
# Get the changelog content and look for breaking changes
echo -e "\nChecking for breaking changes:"
gh api repos/aquasecurity/trivy-action/contents/CHANGELOG.md --jq '.content' | \
tr -d '\n' | \
jq -R 'split(".") | .[0] | @base64d' | \
grep -B 1 -A 2 -i "breaking"
Length of output: 930
.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml (1)
61-61: Verify Trivy version upgrade compatibility
The upgrade from v0.21.0 to v0.28.0 is a significant version jump that improves security coverage.
Let's verify if there are any breaking changes in this upgrade:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to check for breaking changes in the Trivy GitHub Action specifically, since the previous script didn't provide enough information.
Let me try one more verification with a different approach to check the action's repository:
Let me try one final verification focusing on the main repository's action file:
Trivy Action upgrade is safe to proceed
The version upgrade from v0.21.0 to v0.28.0 is safe as:
- Both workflow files use identical configuration parameters that are basic and stable
- The parameters used (
image-ref,format,exit-code,ignore-unfixed,vuln-type,severity) are core features that remain unchanged - The configuration focuses on essential vulnerability scanning with consistent settings across workflows
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Trivy release notes for breaking changes between versions
# Fetch release notes for relevant versions
gh release view v0.28.0 --repo aquasecurity/trivy
for ver in $(gh release list --repo aquasecurity/trivy | grep -o "v0.2[1-8]\.0" | sort -V); do
echo "=== $ver ==="
gh release view $ver --repo aquasecurity/trivy | grep -i "breaking\|migration"
done
Length of output: 3674
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Trivy GitHub Action changelog for breaking changes
gh api repos/aquasecurity/trivy-action/commits --paginate | jq -r '.[] | select(.commit.message | test("(?i)breaking|migration")) | "=== Commit " + .sha[0:7] + " ===\n" + .commit.message + "\n"' || true
# Also check the current action.yml for any parameter changes
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/trivy-action/0.28.0/action.yml
echo "=== Previous version parameters ==="
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/trivy-action/0.21.0/action.yml
Length of output: 482
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Clone the repo to check changes between versions
git clone https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy-action.git /tmp/trivy-action
cd /tmp/trivy-action
# Compare the action.yml between versions
git checkout 0.21.0 2>/dev/null
echo "=== v0.21.0 inputs ==="
git show 0.21.0:action.yml | grep -A 50 "inputs:"
git checkout 0.28.0 2>/dev/null
echo -e "\n=== v0.28.0 inputs ==="
git show 0.28.0:action.yml | grep -A 50 "inputs:"
# Check commit messages between versions for breaking changes
echo -e "\n=== Commits between v0.21.0 and v0.28.0 ==="
git log --oneline 0.21.0..0.28.0 | grep -i "breaking\|migration"
Length of output: 733
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the current workflow file configuration
echo "=== Current Trivy Action Configuration ==="
cat .github/workflows/docker-publish.yml | grep -A 10 "uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action"
# Check if there are other workflow files using Trivy
echo -e "\n=== Other Trivy Usage in Workflows ==="
find .github/workflows -type f -name "*.yml" -exec grep -l "aquasecurity/trivy-action" {} \;
# Show their configurations too
for file in $(find .github/workflows -type f -name "*.yml"); do
if grep -q "aquasecurity/trivy-action" "$file"; then
echo -e "\n=== $file configuration ==="
cat "$file" | grep -A 10 "uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action"
fi
done
Length of output: 1955
Remove global ts-node installation and add build step for TypeScript. Copy tsconfig.json and update CMD to run compiled JavaScript. Adjust package.json scripts to include build and start commands.
Transcribe TS to JS during build time
Summary by CodeRabbit
.gitignorefile to improve project cleanliness by excluding unnecessary files from version control.