Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

K8SPG-648 add PG17 support #921

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

K8SPG-648 add PG17 support #921

wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

hors
Copy link
Collaborator

@hors hors commented Oct 5, 2024

K8SPG-648 Powered by Pull Request Badge

CHANGE DESCRIPTION

Problem:
Short explanation of the problem.

Cause:
Short explanation of the root cause of the issue if applicable.

Solution:
Short explanation of the solution we are providing with this PR.

CHECKLIST

Jira

  • Is the Jira ticket created and referenced properly?
  • Does the Jira ticket have the proper statuses for documentation (Needs Doc) and QA (Needs QA)?
  • Does the Jira ticket link to the proper milestone (Fix Version field)?

Tests

  • Is an E2E test/test case added for the new feature/change?
  • Are unit tests added where appropriate?

Config/Logging/Testability

  • Are all needed new/changed options added to default YAML files?
  • Did we add proper logging messages for operator actions?
  • Did we ensure compatibility with the previous version or cluster upgrade process?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported PG version?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported Kubernetes version?

@egegunes egegunes added this to the v2.6.0 milestone Nov 25, 2024
inelpandzic
inelpandzic previously approved these changes Dec 11, 2024
@JNKPercona
Copy link
Collaborator

Test name Status
custom-extensions passed
custom-tls passed
demand-backup passed
finalizers passed
init-deploy passed
monitoring passed
one-pod passed
operator-self-healing passed
pitr passed
scaling passed
scheduled-backup passed
self-healing passed
sidecars passed
start-from-backup passed
tablespaces passed
telemetry-transfer passed
upgrade-consistency passed
upgrade-minor passed
users passed
We run 19 out of 19

commit: c3fe538
image: perconalab/percona-postgresql-operator:PR-921-c3fe53872

@@ -161,6 +166,8 @@ func (r *PGClusterReconciler) watchSecrets() handler.TypedFuncs[*corev1.Secret,
// +kubebuilder:rbac:groups=apps,resources=replicasets,verbs=create;delete;get;list;patch;watch
// +kubebuilder:rbac:groups=pgv2.percona.com,resources=perconapgclusters/finalizers,verbs=update
// +kubebuilder:rbac:groups=batch,resources=jobs,verbs=create;list;update
// +kubebuilder:rbac:groups=pgv2.percona.com,resources=pods,verbs=create;delete
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have pods resource in this api group?

}

if err := r.Client.Create(ctx, p); err != nil {
return errors.Wrap(err, "failed to create pod to check patrni version")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return errors.Wrap(err, "failed to create pod to check patrni version")
return errors.Wrap(err, "failed to create pod to check patroni version")

@@ -39,13 +39,17 @@ var _ API = Executor(nil)
// waits up to two "loop_wait" or until an error occurs. When Patroni is paused,
// next cannot be blank. Similar to the "POST /switchover" REST endpoint.
func (exec Executor) ChangePrimaryAndWait(
ctx context.Context, current, next string,
ctx context.Context, current, next string, ver4 bool,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i would name this patroniVer4 to be more clear

Copy link
Contributor

@inelpandzic inelpandzic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides @egegunes comments, this looks good.
@pooknull pls check those comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants