-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 305
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
auction: add views to the ActionView
definition
#4295
Conversation
6d9295f
to
2a81ac8
Compare
component.auction.v1alpha1.ActionDutchAuctionEnd action_dutch_auction_end = 54; | ||
component.auction.v1alpha1.ActionDutchAuctionWithdraw action_dutch_auction_withdraw = 55; | ||
component.auction.v1alpha1.ActionDutchAuctionWithdrawView action_dutch_auction_withdraw = 55; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jessepinho oversight on our end, but this should fix it.
ActionViews
ActionView
definition
Does this break protos that were released, or just what's on main? |
we publish to the BSR on main right? the blast damage should only be a branch in the web repo though |
checking my understanding: this is not a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks good to me! 🔨
@cratelyn that's right, however this would be a pretty bad client breaking change |
Let's break some protos, shall we 😎 |
Describe your changes
This PR adds
ActionDutchAuctionScheduleView
andActionDutchAuctionWithdrawView
to theActionView
message, it also replaces theIsAction
perspective impls with concrete implementation.Populating a view for the withdraw action without extending the
TxP
structure has proven squirrelly, and it will require a follow-up, although the data is "here" in the view server so I don't think it will be too complicated.Issue ticket number and link
Part of #4219
Checklist before requesting a review
If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: