Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(deps): bump Swatinem/rust-cache from 2.7.0 to 2.7.1 #795

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 23, 2023

Bumps Swatinem/rust-cache from 2.7.0 to 2.7.1.

Changelog

Sourced from Swatinem/rust-cache's changelog.

Changelog

2.7.1

  • Update toml parser to fix parsing errors.

2.7.0

  • Properly cache trybuild tests.

2.6.2

  • Fix toml parsing.

2.6.1

  • Fix hash contributions of Cargo.lock/Cargo.toml files.

2.6.0

  • Add "buildjet" as a second cache-provider backend.
  • Clean up sparse registry index.
  • Do not clean up src of -sys crates.
  • Remove .cargo/credentials.toml before saving.

2.5.1

  • Fix hash contribution of Cargo.lock.

2.5.0

  • feat: Rm workspace crates version before caching.
  • feat: Add hash of .cargo/config.toml to key.

2.4.0

  • Fix cache key stability.
  • Use 8 character hash components to reduce the key length, making it more readable.

2.3.0

  • Add cache-all-crates option, which enables caching of crates installed by workflows.
  • Add installed packages to cache key, so changes to workflows that install rust tools are detected and cached properly.
  • Fix cache restore failures due to upstream bug.
  • Fix EISDIR error due to globed directories.
  • Update runtime @actions/cache, @actions/io and dev typescript dependencies.
  • Update npm run prepare so it creates distribution files with the right line endings.

2.2.1

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Note
Automatic rebases have been disabled on this pull request as it has been open for over 30 days.

Bumps [Swatinem/rust-cache](https://github.com/swatinem/rust-cache) from 2.7.0 to 2.7.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/swatinem/rust-cache/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/Swatinem/rust-cache/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](Swatinem/rust-cache@a95ba19...3cf7f8c)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: Swatinem/rust-cache
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@ordian ordian merged commit 8384f5f into master Dec 5, 2023
6 checks passed
@ordian ordian deleted the dependabot/github_actions/Swatinem/rust-cache-2.7.1 branch December 5, 2023 22:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants