Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: P4ADEV-1633 classify-iuv-activity-retrieve-tes-iuf #66

Merged

Conversation

silvanotamburini
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Activity Classify Iuv - retrieve TES IUF

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

Implementation of activities

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Pre-Deploy Test
    • Unit
    • Integration (Narrow)
  • Post-Deploy Test
    • Isolated Microservice
    • Broader Integration
    • Acceptance
    • Performance & Load

Types of changes

  • PATCH - Bug fix (backwards compatible bug fixes)
  • MINOR - New feature (add functionality in a backwards compatible manner)
  • MAJOR - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@silvanotamburini silvanotamburini changed the title P4ADEV-1633 classify-iuv-activity-retrieve-tes-iuf feat: P4ADEV-1633 classify-iuv-activity-retrieve-tes-iuf Dec 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@antonioT90 antonioT90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@silvanotamburini silvanotamburini merged commit 773f382 into main Jan 2, 2025
11 checks passed
@silvanotamburini silvanotamburini deleted the P4ADEV-1633-classify-iuv-activity-retrieve-tes-iuf branch January 2, 2025 16:11
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.24.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants