Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various fixes for IC deployments. #199

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Various fixes for IC deployments. #199

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

dceara
Copy link
Collaborator

@dceara dceara commented Mar 27, 2024

No description provided.

dceara added 2 commits March 27, 2024 20:21
By default the container running ovn-tester could use only up to 2048
pids.  With large scale OVN-IC tests (e.g., 500 zones) the tester
(through ovsdbapp) was failing to spawn enough threads to handle all the
database connections.

Remove the pid limit.

NOTE: this is a bit of a band aid because it doesn't fix the real
bottleneck in such scenarios, i.e., the fact that the tester still keeps
long lived connections to all DBs.

Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
…verlaps.

With IC deployments these defaults are used as base for computing the
subnet (external, gw and ts) that should be used by each zone.

With larger scale tests, e.g., 500 nodes, when using default
values we would get overlapping IPs between external and gw
subnets.

Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
ovn-tester/ovn_workload.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
There's no need for a long lived one.  We use it to create the transit
switch, once.

Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@igsilya igsilya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't test, but looks correct to me.

@dceara dceara merged commit f70fc1a into ovn-org:main Apr 2, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@dceara dceara deleted the fix-ic branch April 2, 2024 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants