-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 313
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
model: Eliminate the use of a SortedSet
#8694
Conversation
d3bd2bb
to
3e01ede
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8694 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 67.86% 67.85% -0.02%
Complexity 1165 1165
============================================
Files 244 244
Lines 7734 7736 +2
Branches 865 865
============================================
Hits 5249 5249
- Misses 2126 2128 +2
Partials 359 359
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Correct, but maps are also not collections 😅 But I cannot think of a better name either 😸 |
hehe, right. I missed that 😅 |
The file contains both, `SortedSet` and `SortedMap` converters. Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <[email protected]>
Using a `SortedSet` is not required. Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <[email protected]>
Only sort on serialization for human readability and reproducibility. Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <[email protected]>
3e01ede
to
5012c79
Compare
Please see individual commits.
Part of #6235.