Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(model): Add the property Issue.affectedPath #7963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

fviernau
Copy link
Member

@fviernau fviernau commented Nov 30, 2023

This property can be set in case the issue is limited to a file or directory. This prepares for making use of it for ScanCode timeout issues, e.g. filter out irrelevant timeout issues if outside the VCS path or matched by a path exclude.

Part of: #7921.

This property can be set in case the issue is limited to a file or
directory. This prepares for making use of it for ScanCode timeout
issues, e.g. filter out irrelevant timeout issues if outside the VCS
path or matched by a path exclude.

Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <[email protected]>
@fviernau fviernau requested a review from a team as a code owner November 30, 2023 12:11
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (33be29a) 67.01% compared to head (b3feae8) 67.01%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #7963   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     67.01%   67.01%           
  Complexity     2041     2041           
=========================================
  Files           357      357           
  Lines         17103    17103           
  Branches       2443     2443           
=========================================
  Hits          11462    11462           
  Misses         4623     4623           
  Partials       1018     1018           
Flag Coverage Δ
funTest-docker 66.91% <ø> (ø)
funTest-non-docker 34.35% <ø> (ø)
test 36.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@sschuberth sschuberth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I'd like @mnonnenmacher to also approve.

val severity: Severity = Severity.ERROR,

/**
* The affected file or directory the issue is limited to, if any.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe "the issue is related to" or "that causes the issue"?

* The affected file or directory the issue is limited to, if any.
*/
@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)
val affectedPath: String? = null
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not so happy with the name. affectedPath sounds like the file at this location is affected by the issue. For example, if a file system is corrupt, then files can be affected by this. But with the example of a ScanCode timeout, the timeout does not affect the file at all, the file is merely the cause of the issue because ScanCode cannot handle it for some reason.
Since we do not know what kinds of issues might make use of this property in future, shall we just call it filePath or path?

Copy link
Member

@sschuberth sschuberth Nov 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But with the example of a ScanCode timeout, the timeout does not affect the file at all

Well, I'm reading it differently, like "What thing was affected by the timeout? The file, because it's contents were not properly scanned."

Since we do not know what kinds of issues might make use of this property in future, shall we just call it filePath or path?

As mentioned on Slack I was against filePath as also directories could be affected, and path sounds overly generic, though I could live with it. Maybe relatedPath?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I remove myself / my preference from this discussion and will implement what you guys agree @mnonnenmacher @sschuberth.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If both of you are happy with the current name please just go ahead.

@fviernau fviernau requested a review from sschuberth December 1, 2023 16:27
@fviernau fviernau enabled auto-merge (rebase) December 1, 2023 16:29
@fviernau fviernau merged commit 521640b into main Dec 1, 2023
22 checks passed
@fviernau fviernau deleted the model-affected-path-issue branch December 1, 2023 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants