Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(Gradle): Configure detekt tasks lazily #7717

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2023

Conversation

sschuberth
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@sschuberth sschuberth requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2023 16:27
@sschuberth sschuberth enabled auto-merge (rebase) October 19, 2023 16:27
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0c92be6) 67.81% compared to head (378cf85) 67.81%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #7717   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     67.81%   67.81%           
  Complexity     2045     2045           
=========================================
  Files           352      352           
  Lines         16821    16821           
  Branches       2379     2379           
=========================================
  Hits          11408    11408           
  Misses         4425     4425           
  Partials        988      988           
Flag Coverage Δ
funTest-non-docker 36.44% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sschuberth sschuberth merged commit d351a59 into main Oct 19, 2023
22 checks passed
@sschuberth sschuberth deleted the configure-detekt-lazily branch October 19, 2023 17:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants