Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(PipFunTest): Update expected results #7612

Conversation

nnobelis
Copy link
Member

@nnobelis nnobelis commented Oct 2, 2023

No description provided.

@nnobelis nnobelis requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2023 08:51
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7e3de27) 68.03% compared to head (1963a2f) 68.12%.
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #7612      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     68.03%   68.12%   +0.08%     
- Complexity     2022     2030       +8     
============================================
  Files           344      344              
  Lines         16723    16857     +134     
  Branches       2370     2406      +36     
============================================
+ Hits          11377    11483     +106     
- Misses         4363     4386      +23     
- Partials        983      988       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
funTest-docker 69.36% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
funTest-non-docker 36.44% <ø> (ø)
test 35.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@oheger-bosch oheger-bosch merged commit 0057704 into oss-review-toolkit:main Oct 2, 2023
21 checks passed
@oheger-bosch oheger-bosch deleted the nnobelis/update-python-results branch October 2, 2023 09:56
@nnobelis
Copy link
Member Author

nnobelis commented Oct 2, 2023

This PR was not needed because #7610 was done yesterday.
Sorry for the mixup...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants