Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor updates to the ziti-router service template #281
base: kevinlmadison-router-proxy-services
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Minor updates to the ziti-router service template #281
Changes from 1 commit
6d9603f
d2052bd
95cb4f0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wow. I'm surprised I missed those typos! I definitely tested this, so now I'm wondering how it ever worked. I could only have tested the default service. 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Matching the zitiService instead of k8sService isn't crazy. 🤪 It will work either way. With those typos, I don't see how anyone could use this feature successfully, so I'm guessing the contributor tweaked it further to get it working in their fork, and that makes the risk of a breaking change vanishingly small.
Instead of matching
proxyAdditionalK8sServices[].name
, it would be more obvious how this works to use the exact property that needs to match a member ofproxyServices
, i.e., letproxyAdditionalK8sServices[].name
becomeproxyAdditionalK8sServices[].zitiService
in the template and update values.yaml example/inline comment guidance to reflect the new pattern.If you agree, then the values.yaml would look something like this:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I definitely agree, I forgot to revisit this naming after getting things working.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool. Thanks for those two commits to line up the names. Will you please edit the values.yaml with something like that example above? If that snippet works for you I could add it in my branch after this merges.