Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT REVIEW][DO NOT MERGE] Removal ONNX dependency #27757

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gkrivor
Copy link
Contributor

@gkrivor gkrivor commented Nov 26, 2024

Details:

  • Testing removal of ONNX dependency

Tickets:

  • 157141

@github-actions github-actions bot added category: build OpenVINO cmake script / infra category: ONNX FE OpenVINO ONNX FrontEnd category: dependency_changes Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@p-wysocki p-wysocki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Am I correct that onnx.proto is a sufficient replacement for model generation instead of the thirdparty repository? If so, is the plan to keep it up to date manually together with Python package version bump?

@gkrivor
Copy link
Contributor Author

gkrivor commented Nov 26, 2024

Am I correct that onnx.proto is a sufficient replacement for model generation instead of the thirdparty repository? If so, is the plan to keep it up to date manually together with Python package version bump?

Yes and yes. But it is only a PoC right now

@gkrivor gkrivor marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 08:35
@gkrivor gkrivor requested review from a team as code owners November 27, 2024 08:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: build OpenVINO cmake script / infra category: dependency_changes Pull requests that update a dependency file category: ONNX FE OpenVINO ONNX FrontEnd do_not_merge do_not_review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants