Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configure dogpile.cache to deal with memcached pods failures #511

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lmiccini
Copy link

Whenever one of the mecached pods disappears, because of a rolling restart during a minor update or as result of a failure, APIs can take a long time to detect that the pod went away and keep trying to reconnect.

From a quick round of tests we saw downtimes up to ~150s.

By enabling the retry_client and limiting the number of retries the behavior seems much more acceptable.

Similarly, when TLS is not in use, we may want to set a lower value for memcache_dead_retry so to eventually reconnect to a new pod (having the same dns name but different ip) much faster.

Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-11935

Whenever one of the mecached pods disappears, because of a rolling
restart during a minor update or as result of a failure, APIs can
take a long time to detect that the pod went away and keep trying
to reconnect.

From a quick round of tests we saw downtimes up to ~150s.

By enabling the retry_client and limiting the number of retries
the behavior seems much more acceptable.

Similarly, when TLS is not in use, we may want to set a lower
value for memcache_dead_retry so to eventually reconnect to a new
pod (having the same dns name but different ip) much faster.
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 27, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lmiccini
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lewisdenny for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

@gibizer gibizer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The direction looks good. Thanks @lmiccini !

I agree that it would be worth trying this out in nova-operator as well with some manual update testing to see the timing differences. But I will not have time to do it soon.

cc @mrkisaolamb for awareness.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants