Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Swagger typings for getAll #622

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

azizdiakite
Copy link
Contributor

Description of what I changed

Issue I worked on

see https://issues.openmrs.org/browse/RESTWS-

Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)

  • My IDE is configured to follow the code style of this project.

    No? Unsure? -> configure your IDE, format the code and add the changes with git add . && git commit --amend

  • I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored
    existing code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)

    No? -> write tests and add them to this commit git add . && git commit --amend

  • I ran mvn clean package right before creating this pull request and
    added all formatting changes to my commit.

    No? -> execute above command

  • All new and existing tests passed.

    No? -> figure out why and add the fix to your commit. It is your responsibility to make sure your code works.

  • My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.

    No? Unsure? -> execute command git pull --rebase upstream master

@ibacher ibacher changed the title improve swagger typings for getAll Improve Swagger typings for getAll Sep 10, 2024
Comment on lines +1072 to +1074
operation.addResponse("200",
response200.schema(new ArrayProperty(
new RefProperty(getSchemaRef(resourceName, resourceParentName, OperationEnum.get)))));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not deeply familiar with Swagger. Could you leave a comment with a brief description of how this changes things? Is it replacing the definition of the return value with something that matches the GET request?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently, the getAll operation on a resouce is not properly typed in swagger. It returns a generic type called FetchAll, which has no typing information of the actual array being returned. (For example, getAll on patients should return PatientGet[]). This change should fix that.

Here's the typing for getAll on Patient currently:
image

@chibongho chibongho merged commit 4a54c44 into openmrs:master Sep 10, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants