Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.28.0 #388

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 24, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
react-router-dom (source) 6.14.2 -> 6.28.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

remix-run/react-router (react-router-dom)

v6.28.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
    • Log deprecation warnings for v7 flags (#​11750)
    • Add deprecation warnings to json/defer in favor of returning raw objects
      • These methods will be removed in React Router v7
Patch Changes

v6.27.0

Compare Source

v6.26.2

Compare Source

v6.26.1

Compare Source

v6.26.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new replace(url, init?) alternative to redirect(url, init?) that performs a history.replaceState instead of a history.pushState on client-side navigation redirects (#​11811)
Patch Changes
  • Fix initial hydration behavior when using future.v7_partialHydration along with unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss (#​11838)
    • During initial hydration, router.state.matches will now include any partial matches so that we can render ancestor HydrateFallback components
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.25.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.25.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Stabilize future.unstable_skipActionErrorRevalidation as future.v7_skipActionErrorRevalidation (#​11769)

    • When this flag is enabled, actions will not automatically trigger a revalidation if they return/throw a Response with a 4xx/5xx status code
    • You may still opt-into revalidation via shouldRevalidate
    • This also changes shouldRevalidate's unstable_actionStatus parameter to actionStatus
Patch Changes

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • Fix fetcher.submit types - remove incorrect navigate/fetcherKey/unstable_viewTransition options because they are only relevant for useSubmit (#​11631)
  • Allow falsy location.state values passed to <StaticRouter> (#​11495)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
    • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
    • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more
Patch Changes

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.1

Compare Source

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Include a window__reactRouterVersion tag for CWV Report detection (#​11222)
Patch Changes

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix NavLink isPending when a basename is used (#​11195)
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
        <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
      </Routes>
    </BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
      return (
        <div>
          <h2>Dashboard</h2>
          <nav>
            <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
            <Link to="team">Team</Link>
            <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
          </nav>
    
          <Routes>
            <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
            <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
            <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
          </Routes>
        </div>
      );
    }

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
    function DashboardTeam() {
      // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
      return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
    
      // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
      return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
    }

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="dashboard">
          <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
        </Route>
      </Routes>
    </BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
      path: "/dashboard",
      children: [
        {
          path: "*",
          action: dashboardAction,
          Component() {
            // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
            // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
            // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
            return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
          },
        },
      ],
    });

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="dashboard">
          <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
        </Route>
      </Routes>
    </BrowserRouter>
    
    function Dashboard() {
      return (
        <div>
          <h2>Dashboard</h2>
          <nav>
            <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
            <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
            <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
          </nav>
    
          <Routes>
            <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
            <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
            <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
          </Router>
        </div>
      );
    }

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes

v6.19.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_flushSync option to useNavigate/useSumbit/fetcher.load/fetcher.submit to opt-out of React.startTransition and into ReactDOM.flushSync for state updates (#​11005)
  • Allow unstable_usePrompt to accept a BlockerFunction in addition to a boolean (#​10991)
Patch Changes
  • Fix issue where a changing fetcher key in a useFetcher that remains mounted wasn't getting picked up (#​11009)
  • Fix useFormAction which was incorrectly inheriting the ?index query param from child route action submissions (#​11025)
  • Fix NavLink active logic when to location has a trailing slash (#​10734)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.18.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add support for manual fetcher key specification via useFetcher({ key: string }) so you can access the same fetcher instance from different components in your application without prop-drilling (RFC) (#​10960)

    • Fetcher keys are now also exposed on the fetchers returned from useFetchers so that they can be looked up by key
  • Add navigate/fetcherKey params/props to useSumbit/Form to support kicking off a fetcher submission under the hood with an optionally user-specified key (#​10960)

    • Invoking a fetcher in this way is ephemeral and stateless
    • If you need to access the state of one of these fetchers, you will need to leverage useFetcher({ key }) to look it up elsewhere
Patch Changes
  • Adds a fetcher context to RouterProvider that holds completed fetcher data, in preparation for the upcoming future flag that will change the fetcher persistence/cleanup behavior (#​10961)
  • Fix the future prop on BrowserRouter, HashRouter and MemoryRouter so that it accepts a Partial<FutureConfig> instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#​10962)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.17.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add experimental support for the View Transitions API via document.startViewTransition to enable CSS animated transitions on SPA navigations in your application. (#​10916)

    The simplest approach to enabling a View Transition in your React Router app is via the new <Link unstable_viewTransition> prop. This will cause the navigation DOM update to be wrapped in document.startViewTransition which will enable transitions for the DOM update. Without any additional CSS styles, you'll get a basic cross-fade animation for your page.

    If you need to apply more fine-grained styles for your animations, you can leverage the unstable_useViewTransitionState hook which will tell you when a transition is in progress and you can use that to apply classes or styles:

    function ImageLink(to, src, alt) {
      let isTransitioning = unstable_useViewTransitionState(to);
      return (
        <Link to={to} unstable_viewTransition>
          <img
            src={src}
            alt={alt}
            style={{
              viewTransitionName: isTransitioning ? "image-expand" : "",
            }}
          />
        </Link>
      );
    }

    You can also use the <NavLink unstable_viewTransition> shorthand which will manage the hook usage for you and automatically add a transitioning class to the <a> during the transition:

    a.transitioning img {
      view-transition-name: "image-expand";
    }
    <NavLink to={to} unstable_viewTransition>
      <img src={src} alt={alt} />
    </NavLink>

    For an example usage of View Transitions with React Router, check out our fork of the Astro Records demo.

    For more information on using the View Transitions API, please refer to the Smooth and simple transitions with the View Transitions API guide from the Google Chrome team.

    Please note, that because the ViewTransition API is a DOM API, we now export a specific RouterProvider from react-router-dom with this functionality. If you are importing RouterProvider from react-router, then it will not support view transitions. (#​10928

Patch Changes

v6.16.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • Properly encode rendered URIs in server rendering to avoid hydration errors (#​10769)

v6.15.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add's a new redirectDocument() function which allows users to specify that a redirect from a loader/action should trigger a document reload (via window.location) instead of attempting to navigate to the redirected location via React Router (#​10705)
Patch Changes
  • Fixes an edge-case affecting web extensions in Firefox that use URLSearchParams and the useSearchParams hook. (#​10620)
  • Do not include hash in useFormAction() for unspecified actions since it cannot be determined on the server and causes hydration issues (#​10758)
  • Reorder effects in unstable_usePrompt to avoid throwing an exception if the prompt is unblocked and a navigation is performed synchronously (#​10687, #​10718)
  • Updated dependencies:

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from fa18b10 to c4b3422 Compare April 30, 2024 15:23
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from c4b3422 to 1233972 Compare May 10, 2024 20:13
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.23.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.23.1 May 10, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from 1aa6e9e to 21ae303 Compare May 15, 2024 13:42
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from d9b598b to 5d783a9 Compare May 21, 2024 05:54
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 5d783a9 to 38ee08b Compare June 24, 2024 19:55
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.23.1 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.24.0 Jun 24, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 38ee08b to c23de82 Compare July 9, 2024 17:33
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.24.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.24.1 Jul 9, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from e7cc590 to 0095c37 Compare July 11, 2024 09:26
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.10%. Comparing base (c317ac0) to head (0095c37).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #388      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.08%   80.10%   +1.02%     
==========================================
  Files          35       37       +2     
  Lines         698      749      +51     
  Branches      179      187       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits          552      600      +48     
- Misses        133      136       +3     
  Partials       13       13              

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 798974b...0095c37. Read the comment docs.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from cdf83d3 to d5050d5 Compare July 16, 2024 14:44
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.24.1 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.25.0 Jul 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from d5050d5 to 0047c8b Compare July 17, 2024 19:55
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.25.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.25.1 Jul 17, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 0047c8b to 0208413 Compare August 1, 2024 13:41
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.25.1 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.26.0 Aug 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from bbc88c3 to 9cefe2b Compare August 12, 2024 14:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 9cefe2b to 9074149 Compare August 15, 2024 17:09
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.26.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.26.1 Aug 15, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 5 times, most recently from ccf6e45 to 299eeba Compare September 9, 2024 19:03
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.26.1 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.26.2 Sep 9, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from ff3d9df to c418a6e Compare September 16, 2024 19:31
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from c418a6e to 498889d Compare October 11, 2024 18:33
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.26.2 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.27.0 Oct 11, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from ae73f37 to b091cd1 Compare November 7, 2024 02:05
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.27.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.28.0 Nov 7, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from b091cd1 to e3866da Compare November 25, 2024 10:22
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from e3866da to 2b2d245 Compare November 25, 2024 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants