Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc.go: Perfect description #177

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2018
Merged

Conversation

zhouhao3
Copy link

Signed-off-by: zhouhao [email protected]

@zhouhao3 zhouhao3 changed the title dec.go: Perfect description doc.go: Perfect description Aug 30, 2017
image/doc.go Outdated
@@ -12,5 +12,5 @@
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.

// Package image defines methods for validating, and unpacking OCI images.
// Package image defines methods for validating, unpacking and creating OCI images.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What functionality does it provide for creating images? The only creation functionality I can find is for bundle creation (e.g. CreateRuntimeBundle), and that's part of unpacking an image.

I'd expect image creation to include layer generation (in flight with #8), CAS pushing (in flight with #5), and/or index generation (something like it in #5, but I'm not aware of any image-tools work on this front since opencontainers/image-spec#533).

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What functionality does it provide for creating images?

createBundle

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the new changes can express my thoughts.

coolljt0725 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2017
Implementing the logic that is in-flight with [1], but using recursive
removal [2].  GNU tar has a --recursive-unlink option that's not
enabled by default, with the motivation being something like "folks
would be mad if we blew away a full tree and replaced it with a broken
symlink" [3].  That makes sense for working filesystems, but we're
building the rootfs from scratch here so losing information is not a
concern.  This commit always uses recursive removal to get that old
thing off the filesystem (whatever it takes ;).

The exception to the removal is if both the tar entry and existing
path occupant are directories.  In this case we want to use GNU tar's
default --overwrite-dir behavior, but unpackLayer's metadata handling
is currently very weak so I've left it at "don't delete the old
directory".

The reworked directory case also fixes a minor bug from 44210d0
(cmd/oci-image-tool: fix unpacking..., 2016-07-22, #177) where the:

  if fi, err := os.Lstat(path); !(err == nil && fi.IsDir()) {

block would not error out if the Lstat failed for a reason besides the
acceptable IsNotExist.  Instead, it would attempt to call MkdirAll,
which would probably fail for the same reason that Lstat failed
(e.g. ENOTDIR).  But it's better to handle the Lstat errors directly.

[1]: opencontainers/image-spec#317
[2]: https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/317/files#r79214718
[3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_node/Dealing-with-Old-Files.html

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <[email protected]>
image/doc.go Outdated
@@ -12,5 +12,5 @@
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.

// Package image defines methods for validating, and unpacking OCI images.
// Package image defines methods for validating, unpacking OCI images and creating runtime bundle.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OCI runtime bundle will be better

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated.

@Mashimiao
Copy link

Mashimiao commented Nov 10, 2017

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

1 similar comment
@stevvooe
Copy link
Contributor

stevvooe commented Jan 2, 2018

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

@stevvooe stevvooe merged commit f49fd32 into opencontainers:master Jan 2, 2018
@zhouhao3 zhouhao3 deleted the out-test branch January 3, 2018 01:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants