Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge branch 'main' into feat/tracking
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
toddbaert authored Sep 4, 2024
2 parents 12862f2 + 80ceaa0 commit c70a6ab
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 36 additions and 5 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions specification.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -233,8 +233,8 @@
{
"id": "Requirement 1.4.11",
"machine_id": "requirement_1_4_11",
"content": "In the case of abnormal execution, the client SHOULD log an informative error message.",
"RFC 2119 keyword": "SHOULD",
"content": "Methods, functions, or operations on the client SHOULD NOT write log messages.",
"RFC 2119 keyword": "SHOULD NOT",
"children": []
},
{
Expand Down
27 changes: 26 additions & 1 deletion specification/appendix-a-included-utilities.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ This document contains requirements for auxiliary utilities provided by the SDK,

## In-memory provider

> Language-specific OpenFeature SDK implementations **SHOULD** expose an in-memory provider built into the SDK.
> OpenFeature SDK implementations **SHOULD** provide an `in-memory provider`.
The in-memory provider is intended to be used for testing; SDK consumers may use it for their use cases.
Hence, the packaging, naming, and access modifiers must be set appropriately.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -360,3 +360,28 @@ Providers can contain metadata. The Multi-Provider will make that metadata avail
},
}
```

## Logging Hook

> OpenFeature SDK implementations **SHOULD** provide a `logging hook`.
The logging hook is a hook which logs messages during the flag evaluation life-cycle as described below:

| Stage | Logged data |
| ------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| before | `stage`, `domain`, `provider_name`, `flag_key`, `default_value` and `evaluation_context` (serialized, opt-in) |
| after | `stage`, `domain`, `provider_name`, `flag_key`, `default_value`, `evaluation_context` (serialized, opt-in), `reason`, `variant` and `value` |
| error | `stage`, `domain`, `provider_name`, `flag_key`, `default_value`, `evaluation_context` (serialized, opt-in), `error_code`, and `error_message` |
| finally | N/A |

> The evaluation context **SHOULD** only be logged if an associated option indicates so.
This can be a constructor option or similar, for example: `boolean printContext`.

> If logging the evaluation context is enabled, it **MUST** be printed in such a way that it's human readable.
Consider printing the evaluation context as a stringified JSON object, or using some other format that allows the nested properties to be easily read.

> If the logger abstraction in the SDK supports a log level concept, the appropriate log level **SHOULD** be used for each stage (before/after: debug/info, error: error).
Consider using `debug` or `info` levels for the `before` and `after` stages, and the `error` level for the `error` stage.
10 changes: 8 additions & 2 deletions specification/sections/01-flag-evaluation.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -353,9 +353,15 @@ Configuration code includes code to set the provider, instantiate providers, and

#### Requirement 1.4.11

> In the case of abnormal execution, the client **SHOULD** log an informative error message.
> Methods, functions, or operations on the client **SHOULD NOT** write log messages.
Implementations may define a standard logging interface that can be supplied as an optional argument to the client creation function, which may wrap standard logging functionality of the implementation language.
The client methods (particularly the evaluation methods) run in hot code paths.
Logging (even at error level) can cause a huge volume of log entries.
For example, in a circumstance in which an application expecting a particular flag to exist is deployed in advance of that flag's being defined in the management system, logs can become inundated with `FLAG_NOT_FOUND` messages and related stack traces.
Logging in these code paths is highly discouraged.
Application authors can attach a [logging hook](../appendix-a-included-utilities.md#logging-hook) or author their own custom logging hook(s) to help with debugging or satisfy their particular logging needs.

Logging is encouraged in functions to do with configuration, initialization, shutdown, etc.

#### Requirement 1.4.12

Expand Down

0 comments on commit c70a6ab

Please sign in to comment.